For decades, teachers’ unions have presented themselves as guardians of public education—defenders of teachers’ rights, champions of classroom safety, and protectors of the noble vocation of teaching. But behind this façade lies a complex web of political activism, legal obstruction, and ideological subversion that has steadily undermined the quality of public education in the United States. What began as a necessary push for fairness and professional dignity has morphed into one of the most entrenched and politically potent forces of decay in American culture: a system where mediocrity is protected, excellence is punished, and radical ideology is funneled directly into our children’s classrooms.
This blog post traces the historical rise of teachers’ unions in America, exposes their modern political entanglements—particularly with the Democratic Party—and outlines how they promote harmful ideologies while obstructing Christian values, educational reform, and school choice. Special attention is given to the legal context in Indiana, where conservative citizens may still have options to resist union overreach and protect their children from woke indoctrination in the classroom.
The Early Role of Teachers’ Unions: From Advocacy to Activism
In the early 20th century, American teachers lacked many basic labor protections. They were often paid poorly, lacked benefits, and could be fired for arbitrary reasons. In response, associations like the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) were formed to secure better working conditions and fair treatment. Initially, these groups acted more like professional guilds than political activists, seeking to elevate teaching standards and professional respectability.
But by the mid-20th century, the focus of these organizations shifted. With the rise of public-sector unionism following the 1960s, especially after President Kennedy legalized collective bargaining for federal workers in 1962, the NEA and AFT evolved into powerful political machines. Over time, these unions became less interested in education and more invested in political advocacy—largely aligned with the Democratic Party and its growing embrace of left-wing social theories.
The Politicization of Education: A One-Party Alliance
Today, the NEA and AFT are two of the most politically active unions in America. According to OpenSecrets.org, the NEA has consistently donated over 94% of its political contributions to Democrats. The AFT’s track record is similar, making them de facto appendages of the Democratic Party. Their funding supports liberal candidates, abortion advocacy, gender ideology, LGBTQ+ policy mandates, and anti-parental rights legislation.
These donations—fueled by mandatory dues in many states—help elect school board members, state legislators, and federal officials who push leftist curricula and block conservative reforms. Teachers who pay union dues are effectively subsidizing the Democratic agenda, whether they agree with it or not.
Unions and the Woke Agenda: CRT, Intersectionality, and Gender Ideology
The ideological drift of teachers’ unions has accelerated in recent years. Today, both the NEA and AFT explicitly support educational frameworks rooted in Critical Race Theory (CRT), intersectionality, and radical gender ideology.
- In 2021, the NEA passed a resolution to promote CRT in K-12 classrooms and fund opposition research against critics of “anti-racism.”
- The AFT offers guidance and legal support for teachers who embed gender identity theory and transgenderism into classroom discussion, even at the elementary level.
- Both unions have embraced terms like “equity audits,” “decolonized curricula,” and “gender-affirming education”—jargon that obscures their real aim: to indoctrinate children in radical, unscientific, and morally subversive worldviews.
These policies have introduced ideological confusion, sexual content, and racial resentment into classrooms across America, often without parental consent. Teachers who express concerns—or refuse to comply—are threatened with discipline or socially ostracized.
Silencing Christianity and Western Values
One of the most disturbing consequences of union influence is the marginalization of Christianity and traditional Western values in public education. While unions aggressively promote LGBTQ+ ideologies and racial activism, they simultaneously downplay or suppress religious viewpoints—especially those grounded in biblical truth.
Union-supported policies:
- Prohibit teachers from expressing Christian convictions on sexuality, marriage, or gender.
- Oppose the inclusion of Christian clubs, chaplains, or worldview-friendly literature.
- Defend school administrators who discipline Christian students or staff for sharing their faith.
Unlike Christian-friendly organizations like Christian Educators Association International (CEAI), unions like the NEA and AFT do not defend religious liberty when it conflicts with their progressive agenda.
Liability Insurance: You Don’t Need a Union to Be Protected
A common reason teachers remain in unions is for the liability insurance they offer. However, what many don’t realize is that equal or better protection is available through independent organizations, often at a lower cost and without supporting radical politics.
Key Alternatives:
- Christian Educators Association International (CEAI)
- $2 million in liability coverage.
- Strong legal defense for Christian rights in public schools.
- Annual membership: ~$259.
- Association of American Educators (AAE)
- $2 million coverage.
- Nonpartisan legal and professional support.
- Annual membership: ~$259.
These organizations provide not just coverage, but ideological protection for educators who resist the pressures of wokeness and want to maintain their Christian integrity in the classroom.
Structural Harm: How Unions Weaken Schools Systemically
At the macro level, teachers’ unions create an ecosystem that discourages excellence, rewards incompetence, and obstructs innovation. Key examples include:
- Tenure and Dismissal Laws
- In many union-heavy states, firing an ineffective teacher can take years and cost thousands of dollars in legal fees.
- This protects bad teachers at the expense of student learning.
- “Last In, First Out” (LIFO) Layoffs
- When layoffs are necessary, unions enforce policies that prioritize seniority over merit—meaning younger, better teachers are let go while entrenched mediocrity remains.
- Resistance to Accountability
- Unions oppose performance-based evaluations, standardized testing, and merit pay.
- This ensures uniform pay regardless of competence, and no consequences for failure.
- Opposition to School Choice
- Unions fight vouchers, charter schools, and education savings accounts, blocking families—especially low-income and minority families—from accessing better education alternatives.
- Bureaucratic Bloat and Budget Drain
- Unions often negotiate contracts that increase administrative overhead and reduce funds available for student-focused resources.
- Cultural and Parental Hostility
- In 2021, the NEA considered proposals to monitor and compile opposition research on parents who criticize school board decisions—a chilling sign of authoritarian drift.
Indiana: A Case Study in Resistance
Fortunately, Indiana is a right-to-work state, meaning teachers cannot be forced to join or fund a union as a condition of employment. This legal framework provides significant freedom for conservative educators and reform-minded citizens.
Legal Leverage in Indiana:
- Collective bargaining laws in Indiana are more limited than in union-dominated states like California or New York. School boards still have flexibility in many areas.
- Local school boards can choose not to renew contracts with union-friendly vendors or implement policies that promote parental rights and academic transparency.
- Indiana state law allows for greater curriculum oversight, and conservative leadership in the state has supported transparency bills in the past.
It may be difficult to outright eliminate teachers’ unions, but their power can be restrained through grassroots school board activism, legislative reform, and the promotion of union alternatives.
Action Steps for Concerned Citizens and Educators
- Educators should exit unions and join CEAI or AAE to maintain liability protection and professional support without compromising their values.
- Parents should run for school board positions, demand curriculum transparency, and push for parental rights policies.
- Legislators should further restrict collective bargaining rights, especially regarding curriculum and discipline policies.
- Churches should support Christian educators and inform congregants about the ideological capture of public education.
- Communities should advocate for school choice legislation, education savings accounts, and charter expansion.
Reform Requires Courage
Teachers’ unions are no longer neutral protectors of educators. They are powerful political agents driving leftist ideology into the classroom, obstructing reform, and threatening Christian liberty. While their influence is vast, it is not invincible—especially in states like Indiana, where legal safeguards and civic awareness offer a chance for real change.
It’s time for conservative Christians, constitutionalists, and all concerned citizens to challenge the union monopoly over education, protect our children from ideological harm, and restore virtue, excellence, and truth in the classroom.
Robert Sparkman
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Teacher unions are well-known to be a corrosive force in K-12 education that offers little to no value to the teachers or students. This video does a very good job at exposing their malevolent nature.
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse and do not reflect my personal standards, particularly in regards to leftist protesters and rioters.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.