The Young Turks (TYT) is an online news and commentary network founded in 2002 by Cenk Uygur, a former MSNBC contributor, and co-hosted by Ana Kasparian, among others. It began as a radio show before expanding to YouTube, becoming one of the earliest and most aggressive examples of a fully digital leftist broadcast outlet. TYT’s name is drawn from the revolutionary movement that overthrew the Ottoman Empire—though that historical reference has drawn criticism for its association with the Armenian Genocide, which Uygur once controversially denied (he has since walked that back).
The Young Turks is owned primarily by TYT Network LLC, with Cenk Uygur as the public face and ideological engine. In 2017, TYT received $20 million in venture capital from investors such as Wakeland Capital and George Soros–linked organizations, including a round involving Helios and Matheson Analytics. These funding streams, combined with TYT’s ongoing ideological alignment, underscore its deep integration into the progressive activist-media ecosystem.
Whereas traditional outlets once strove for the veneer of objectivity, TYT dispenses with such pretenses. It is unabashedly left-wing, aggressively anti-conservative, and frequently antagonistic toward traditional religion, capitalism, and American foundational ideals. It positions itself not as a neutral informer, but as a revolutionary voice for what it considers justice, equality, and progressivism.
The network openly champions a socialist or “democratic socialist” worldview, promotes identity politics, and regularly frames the political right—and often the center-left—as complicit in systemic injustice. Its hosts are known for emotional intensity, derision toward political opponents, and frequent use of crude or incendiary language.
TYT’s appeal has been especially strong among younger, secular, progressive audiences—especially those disillusioned with corporate Democrats and traditional liberalism. It helped popularize figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Bernie Sanders, and it frequently serves as a megaphone for the Democratic Socialist wing of the Democratic Party.
In short, TYT is not just a media company—it is a movement organ, functioning like a digital campus for training a generation of radical progressives.
Typical Claims and Outlook
The Young Turks is not a news outlet in the traditional sense. It is a broadcast arm of progressive outrage, combining rapid-fire commentary, ideological certainty, and performative indignation. While its presenters occasionally report on actual news stories, their primary function is not to investigate, but to interpret events through a radical leftist lens—often emotionally, rarely impartially.
TYT’s coverage reflects the following recurrent themes and ideological assumptions:
1. Systemic Oppression as the Framework for Everything
Whether the subject is economics, healthcare, policing, climate, gender, or foreign policy, TYT returns to a central theme: America is structurally corrupt. Capitalism, whiteness, masculinity, religion, and the nuclear family are often portrayed as inherently oppressive systems that must be dismantled. Hosts rarely deal in nuance. If a story involves wealth, hierarchy, or tradition, it’s assumed to be evil.
For example, billionaires aren’t simply wealthy—they’re parasites. Police officers aren’t flawed civil servants—they’re agents of a racist state. Churches aren’t moral communities—they’re bigoted institutions reinforcing patriarchy. This absolutism appeals to younger viewers, but it leaves no room for principled disagreement.
2. Constant Framing of the Political Right as Evil and Dangerous
Conservatives are rarely depicted as mistaken or misguided. They are portrayed as monsters, fascists, racists, Nazis, and theocrats. The Young Turks routinely equate mainstream conservative policies with white supremacy or religious extremism. This is not commentary—it is rhetorical warfare.
Hosts frequently assign malicious intent to the motivations of conservative politicians, evangelical Christians, or traditional parents. Opposing gender ideology or abortion rights is not treated as a matter of conscience but as a symptom of hate. This moral framing is fundamental to TYT’s editorial strategy: if the Right is evil, then TYT’s emotional fury is righteous.
3. Populist Leftism with a Marxist Flare
While TYT does not typically use academic terms like “Cultural Marxism,” its worldview is saturated with its assumptions. Every inequality is the result of exploitation. Every traditional norm is a form of oppression. Every hierarchy is unjust unless it privileges progressive groups.
Cenk Uygur has argued for the complete restructuring of society—from campaign finance to the healthcare system—based on centralized, collectivist principles. Ana Kasparian has attacked the notion of parental rights in education, defended drag performances for children, and supported coercive state policies to enforce progressive morality.
4. Emotionalism Over Evidence
In contrast to even some left-leaning legacy outlets, TYT thrives on emotional momentum rather than intellectual depth. Its hosts often shout, sneer, and mock those they disagree with. Sarcasm and profanity substitute for logic and data. The goal is not to persuade skeptics—it’s to galvanize the tribe.
This style is part of TYT’s brand. It attracts those who already agree and gives them ideological ammunition. But it also reveals the network’s purpose: not journalism, but agitation.
Specific Incidents of Bias
While The Young Turks is known for its daily barrage of opinion-driven segments, there have been numerous high-profile incidents that showcase just how deeply its bias runs—and how often that bias produces distortions, slanders, or outright misinformation. Below are some particularly revealing examples:
1. Kyle Rittenhouse Coverage (2020–2021)
The Young Turks aggressively covered the Rittenhouse trial, portraying the teenager as a white supremacist, domestic terrorist, and murderer. Hosts like Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian initially claimed he crossed state lines with a firearm “looking for trouble” and “executed people in cold blood.”
However, much of their commentary collapsed under the weight of video evidence and sworn testimony. Even as Kasparian later admitted she was wrong on key facts (like who initiated the aggression), TYT never corrected its broader narrative: that Rittenhouse symbolized everything evil about white America and gun culture.
Their misrepresentation was not an isolated mistake—it was part of a pattern in which they began with a conclusion and retrofitted the facts.
2. Nick Sandmann and the Covington Catholic Students (2019)
TYT immediately joined the media mob against Sandmann, a high school student wrongly accused of confronting a Native American activist in Washington, D.C. The original viral clip seemed to show him smirking disrespectfully while wearing a MAGA hat.
Without waiting for the full video (which later exonerated Sandmann and showed he was the one being harassed), Cenk Uygur denounced the students as racists and provocateurs, echoing the worst assumptions of the mainstream press. No formal apology was issued.
3. Support for the Jussie Smollett Hoax (2019)
When actor Jussie Smollett claimed to be attacked in a racist, homophobic hate crime by Trump supporters, TYT gave the story uncritical, sympathetic coverage. Ana Kasparian, in particular, used the case to denounce “Trump’s America” as a haven for hate.
When the story unraveled—revealing that Smollett had staged the attack himself—TYT quietly moved on. No retraction matched the fervor of the original outrage.
4. Relentless Smearing of Christian Figures and Groups
TYT has published and aired numerous segments attacking Christian institutions and individuals, often with derision and mocking tones. Evangelical Christians are painted as backward and dangerous. Pro-life advocates are routinely called “anti-woman,” and traditional views on marriage are framed as “hate speech.”
One telling example was Cenk Uygur’s sarcastic attacks on the late Billy Graham, whom he compared to Islamic extremists. These attacks reflect not merely disagreement but deep hostility toward biblical Christianity, which TYT considers one of the root problems in American life.
5. Bernie Sanders Favoritism and Internal Dissent
Despite TYT’s support for Bernie Sanders, the network faced internal tension over journalistic standards during the 2020 Democratic primaries. Several TYT reporters were pressured to toe the editorial line in favor of Sanders and progressive insurgents, even when other Democratic candidates performed better on key issues.
Former employees described an atmosphere in which “independent journalism” was discouraged if it contradicted the preferred narrative—a pattern that shows TYT’s tribalism often overrides facts.
These incidents reveal that TYT is not simply left-leaning. It is doctrinaire, punitive, and ideologically militant. When the facts get in the way, the facts are sidelined—and when stories implode, the retractions are whispered or ignored.
The Young Turks’ Position on the 20 Key Issues
The Young Turks consistently takes an aggressive hard-left stance on virtually every major political and cultural issue. Their editorial philosophy reflects the intersectional, revolutionary ethos of contemporary progressivism—rooted in Marxist, postmodern, and radical egalitarian ideologies. Below is a summary of how TYT aligns on the twenty defining issues that reveal a media outlet’s ideological position:
1. Abortion
TYT is militantly pro-abortion. It rejects any restrictions on abortion, opposes parental notification laws, and denounces pro-life organizations as anti-woman religious extremists. Hosts often refer to abortion as “healthcare” and dismiss fetal personhood as a right-wing fantasy.
2. LGBTQ+ Ideology
The network is fully affirming of the LGBTQ+ spectrum, including drag culture, gender fluidity, and same-sex parenting. It portrays all criticism of LGBTQ+ causes as hate speech and treats religious liberty claims as a façade for bigotry.
3. Gender and Transgenderism
TYT promotes radical transgender ideology, defending youth transition, puberty blockers, and gender-affirming surgery even for minors. It attacks terms like “biological woman” and vilifies critics—including feminists and medical professionals—as transphobes.
4. Race and Critical Race Theory (CRT)
The Young Turks are vocal proponents of CRT, describing American institutions as systemically racist. They support reparations, equity programs, and racial quotas. Opposition to CRT is presented as white supremacy in disguise.
5. Religious Liberty
TYT treats religious liberty with suspicion, especially for Christians. The network often argues that appeals to conscience or doctrine—on matters like marriage or healthcare—are just “excuses to discriminate.”
6. The Second Amendment
The network supports bans on so-called “assault weapons,” red flag laws, and expanded gun control. Hosts deride gun owners and frequently tie the Second Amendment to racism, male fragility, or white nationalism.
7. Immigration and Borders
TYT advocates for open-border policies, defends sanctuary cities, and attacks ICE and Border Patrol as racist and abusive. The idea of national sovereignty or border enforcement is treated as inherently xenophobic.
8. Law Enforcement and Policing
The outlet consistently supports the “Defund the Police” narrative. Police are portrayed as violent, racist institutions, while criminal activity is often excused as the result of poverty and systemic injustice.
9. Israel and the Middle East
The Young Turks are staunchly pro-Palestinian. They label Israel an “apartheid state,” accuse it of genocide, and promote the narrative of Israeli colonialism. Hamas and other terror groups are often rationalized as “resistance movements.”
10. Islam and Religious Critique
Criticism of Islam is labeled Islamophobic, even when it concerns radical ideology or violence. TYT frequently gives Islam a deferential treatment it does not extend to Christianity, framing Muslims as victims of Western imperialism.
11. Climate Change and Environmentalism
TYT embraces climate alarmism and pushes for radical restructuring of the economy under “Green New Deal” frameworks. Capitalism is frequently blamed for environmental degradation. Fossil fuel companies are painted as evil and irredeemable, while state intervention is viewed as the only path to “climate justice.”
12. The Free Market and Capitalism
The Young Turks is openly hostile to capitalism. Cenk Uygur has repeatedly called for the end of the free market in key sectors like health care, housing, and education. They promote massive government redistribution, wage controls, wealth taxes, and worker cooperatives—echoing classic Marxist economic ideas.
13. Education Policy and Indoctrination
TYT defends progressive curriculum in public schools, including LGBTQ+ sex education, anti-racism programs, and gender ideology. Parental objections are often framed as white supremacist or reactionary. The network regularly attacks school choice and portrays Christian schools as hotbeds of hate.
14. The Role of the Family
Traditional family structures are portrayed as products of patriarchy. TYT promotes “non-traditional” families, queer parenting, and communal childrearing philosophies. Nuclear family norms are described as outdated and exclusionary.
15. Censorship and Big Tech
While TYT occasionally critiques Big Tech from the left (claiming they don’t go far enough in policing hate), it strongly supports deplatforming conservatives and so-called “misinformation” sources. It defends social media bans of Trump, COVID skeptics, and those who dissent from progressive orthodoxy.
16. COVID-19 Policy
TYT aligned firmly with the establishment narrative: lockdowns, mandates, and mask policies were strongly supported, and skepticism was treated as deadly misinformation. They opposed religious exemptions and ridiculed those who challenged official vaccine narratives.
17. Judiciary and the Constitution
The network routinely attacks originalist judicial philosophy and the U.S. Constitution as antiquated and systemically racist. It favors court-packing, abolishing the Electoral College, and weakening federalism to empower centralized progressive authority.
18. Historical Narratives
TYT’s coverage of American history focuses on colonization, slavery, genocide, and oppression. The Founding Fathers are vilified. Thanksgiving is a colonial holiday. The narrative of progress is one of constant resistance to white, Christian, male domination.
19. Election Integrity and Voting
TYT asserts that voter ID laws and other election security measures are racist suppression tactics. They downplay concerns about voter fraud and accuse Republicans of undermining democracy, often without evidence. Conversely, they pushed uncritically the claim that Trump stole the 2016 election via Russian collusion.
20. Cultural Institutions and Wokeness
TYT serves as a cultural battering ram for progressive causes in media, entertainment, and academia. Cancel culture is reframed as “accountability,” while anti-woke resistance is labeled fascist. They champion DEI programs and view all institutions—media, law, education, science—as battlegrounds for equity over merit.
Cultural Marxist Influence
The Young Turks is among the most vivid illustrations of Cultural Marxism’s modern expression in media. While the term “Cultural Marxism” is often dismissed or demonized by the Left, TYT operates with the exact hallmarks of this ideological framework, as described by scholars like James Lindsay, Paul Gottfried, and Christopher Rufo.
1. Oppressor-Oppressed Dialectic Applied to Culture
At the core of TYT’s worldview is a cultural adaptation of the Marxist conflict narrative: the oppressors (white, Christian, male, straight, capitalist) must be overthrown by the oppressed (people of color, LGBTQ+, women, the poor, secularists). Every issue—from policing to parenting—is reduced to this binary struggle.
Rather than economic class, identity categories become the main battleground. “Justice” means dismantling existing structures and redistributing power, not wealth alone. This is Cultural Marxism 101.
2. Deconstruction of Traditional Institutions
TYT is consistently hostile toward institutions that undergird Western civilization—the church, the family, the nation-state, and free markets. Christianity is treated as a relic of oppression. The family is seen as patriarchal and heteronormative. National borders are oppressive fictions. The market is inherently exploitative.
This ideological assault mirrors the goals of Cultural Marxist theorists like Antonio Gramsci and Herbert Marcuse, who argued for infiltrating and subverting Western norms to usher in a new moral order aligned with socialist goals.
3. Language as a Tool of Power
The network uses and promotes radically redefined terminology: “gender-affirming care,” “anti-racism,” “equity,” “transphobia,” “toxic masculinity,” “reproductive justice,” and “white supremacy culture.” These phrases are not neutral—they smuggle in entire worldviews, redefining common language to shift moral assumptions.
This reflects postmodern and Marxist theories of language that treat words not as conveyors of truth, but as instruments of power. Control the language, and you control the debate.
4. Utopian Vision of Human Nature
TYT operates from a fundamentally secular, humanist, and utopian anthropology. People are seen as blank slates corrupted by systems—not as fallen beings in need of redemption. Social problems are blamed on structures, never sin or personal responsibility. Progress is expected to come through political revolution, not moral reformation.
Thus, the Christian understanding of the human condition—fallen, accountable, redeemable—is incompatible with TYT’s worldview. In its place is a messianic faith in the state and in “the movement.”
5. Revolution as Redemption
In TYT’s rhetorical universe, redemption comes through activism. The righteous are the “allies,” “resisters,” and “anti-racists” who protest, deconstruct, and disrupt. Sinners are the conservatives, traditionalists, and Christians who must be unlearned, canceled, or re-educated.
This totalizing worldview leaves little room for dialogue. You are either on “the right side of history,” or you are the enemy.
Public Persona and Key Voices
The Young Turks has cultivated a confrontational and activist-driven public persona, built largely around the dominant personalities of its founding and flagship hosts. TYT is not a faceless newsroom; it is a personality brand, where the tone, style, and credibility of its commentators define the outlet more than its journalistic credentials. At the center of that brand is a combination of charisma, certainty, and theatrical outrage.
1. Cenk Uygur – The Belligerent Populist
Cenk Uygur is TYT’s founder, executive producer, and most recognized face. A former Republican who became a progressive firebrand, Uygur is known for his loud, aggressive delivery, populist rants, and relentless attacks on what he sees as corruption in both parties—though especially on the political right.
He portrays himself as a champion of the working class and foe of elites, but his populism is distinctly left-wing and redistributionist. Uygur’s tone often blends brash humor with disdain, and his willingness to use coarse language and personal insults makes him a hero to some and a provocateur to others.
His hypocrisy and contradictions have drawn criticism: Uygur once opposed affirmative action, criticized feminism, and made deeply misogynistic blog posts in the early 2000s. Although he later apologized and shifted further left, these inconsistencies have haunted his credibility.
Notably, Uygur ran (unsuccessfully) for Congress in 2020 and was opposed even by many progressive Democrats, including AOC, due to his past remarks—highlighting that even within leftist circles, TYT’s aggressive posture can be polarizing.
2. Ana Kasparian – The Ideological Enforcer
Ana Kasparian is TYT’s co-host and arguably its most influential voice in shaping younger progressive minds. She brings an air of polished communication and journalistic education, but often displays open contempt for traditional morality and conservative views.
Kasparian’s segments are marked by impassioned monologues, profanity-laced critiques, and emotional intensity. She has been praised for her delivery and clarity, but criticized for dogmatism and unwillingness to engage in fair debate. On topics like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, or Christian values, she often descends into caricature and scorn.
Though she occasionally attempts nuance (such as publicly correcting her Rittenhouse coverage), Kasparian usually doubles down on leftist orthodoxy. Her ideological rigidity makes her a reliable representative of TYT’s worldview—and a lightning rod for criticism from the right.
3. Other Contributors
TYT’s extended roster has included contributors like:
- John Iadarola – Host of The Damage Report, often focused on environmentalism and “climate justice.”
- Francesca Fiorentini – A comedian turned commentator whose segments blend satire with radical politics.
- Hasan Piker – A former TYT contributor known for his online streaming success and controversial remarks (such as glorifying leftist violence and mocking 9/11 victims).
Each of these contributors shares TYT’s core worldview: opposition to capitalism, Christianity, traditional values, and American exceptionalism. While they vary in tone—some being more humorous, others more aggressive—they all swim in the same ideological waters.
TYT’s public face is thus not one of sober reporting, but of ideologically driven performance, carefully tuned to enrage enemies and embolden followers.
Scandals and Controversies
For all its posturing as a moral vanguard of the progressive movement, The Young Turks has been marred by multiple scandals and controversies that reveal serious flaws in its integrity, consistency, and internal culture. These controversies often undermine the network’s credibility, particularly as it rails against others for the very transgressions it has been accused of committing.
1. Cenk Uygur’s Past Misogynistic Blog Posts
One of the most damaging scandals TYT has faced stemmed from blog posts written by Cenk Uygur in the early 2000s, which were unearthed during his 2020 congressional run. In them, Uygur objectified women, mocked feminists, and lamented that he couldn’t have more sex because “there are too many fat women.”
These posts, though old, reflected a view of women as sexual objects and contradicted the progressive feminist values TYT claims to uphold. Though Uygur apologized and claimed to have evolved, the Democratic establishment and even progressive groups distanced themselves from him during his political campaign—revealing that the scandal had lasting implications.
2. Denial of the Armenian Genocide
Uygur publicly denied the Armenian Genocide in a 1991 editorial, calling it an exaggeration by Armenians with political agendas. Although he eventually retracted this stance under public pressure, it left a permanent stain on his record—especially ironic given TYT’s self-styled identity as a champion of historical justice.
This issue was particularly controversial because the network’s very name, “The Young Turks,” refers to the movement historically associated with the genocide. Many Armenian-American groups have called for a renaming of the outlet, but Uygur has refused.
3. Union-Busting Accusations
In a moment of extraordinary hypocrisy, TYT opposed unionization among its own staff in 2020—despite vocally supporting unions nationwide and attacking corporations for anti-union tactics.
When workers at TYT attempted to form a union through IATSE (International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees), Uygur pushed back. He claimed he couldn’t afford it and argued it wasn’t necessary, prompting outrage and mockery from other progressives. TYT was widely accused of union-busting, and the incident damaged its reputation as a workers-first outlet.
4. Sexual Harassment Allegations and Internal Tensions
In 2017, former female staffers alleged that TYT had a toxic workplace culture, including sexist jokes, inappropriate comments, and marginalization of women. Although no criminal charges or major lawsuits followed, the allegations ran counter to TYT’s feminist rhetoric and were seen as part of a broader trend of media hypocrisy.
Insiders have also reported editorial bullying and a pressure to conform ideologically, particularly during election cycles. Some reporters left the organization citing a hostile environment for dissenting views.
5. Platform Integrity and Funding Criticism
TYT has frequently criticized the corrupting influence of corporate money in media and politics—yet it accepted a $20 million investment in 2017 from a venture capital firm tied to wealthy progressive donors, including groups affiliated with George Soros. This funding led to accusations that TYT was no longer truly “independent” and was now just another well-funded activist machine.
Critics pointed out that this funding compromised their anti-establishment brand, especially since they never fully disclosed the strings attached or the influence it might wield on their coverage priorities.
In each of these scandals, The Young Turks has faced accusations not just of wrongdoing, but of hypocrisy—failing to live up to its own standards while aggressively condemning others. The result is a growing credibility gap, even among some on the left.
Public Reception and Influence
The Young Turks occupies a niche but influential position in the modern media landscape—especially among progressive youth, disaffected liberals, and online activists. Despite lacking the institutional stature of networks like CNN or NPR, TYT has outsized cultural impact, largely due to its aggressive style, viral content, and alignment with the digital age’s leftist currents.
1. Audience Composition and Reach
TYT’s reach comes primarily through YouTube, Twitch, podcasts, and social media rather than cable television or traditional broadcasting. It claims millions of subscribers and regularly receives millions of views per month across platforms.
Its audience tends to skew young, urban, secular, and digitally native. Many are college students or recent graduates who consume most of their content online and prefer overt activism to traditional journalism. TYT’s style of emphatic, emotional delivery resonates with this group, especially when paired with humor or righteous indignation.
Among this demographic, TYT is viewed as authentic and courageous—a counterpoint to what they see as corporate-controlled mainstream liberal outlets like MSNBC or CNN. The network has helped radicalize center-left millennials and Gen Zers by framing traditional liberalism as tepid or complicit in systemic injustice.
2. Political Influence
TYT played a key role in popularizing Bernie Sanders and “The Squad”, giving extensive coverage to candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Cori Bush long before they were household names.
The network frequently criticizes mainstream Democrats—particularly the Clintons, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and DNC leadership—claiming they are insufficiently progressive or beholden to corporate interests. This has led to friction with the Democratic establishment, which sees TYT as a disruptive force that undermines party unity.
Many leftist candidates have appeared on TYT during their campaigns, recognizing it as a gateway to mobilizing young progressives. It also hosts interviews with activists, union leaders, and climate radicals, giving them a media platform that traditional outlets often ignore.
3. Criticism and Public Backlash
TYT’s critics span the political spectrum. Conservatives and Christians reject it outright for its hostility toward faith, family, and country. Moderates and classical liberals view it as intolerant and prone to demagoguery. Even some progressives have begun to question the network’s rhetorical excesses and internal contradictions.
The outlet has been accused of being factually loose, emotionally manipulative, and prone to mischaracterizing its opponents. For example, their coverage of events like the Covington Catholic incident and the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was later revealed to be misleading or false, but retractions were rare and half-hearted.
Nevertheless, TYT remains a media pillar of the progressive movement, often echoing and amplifying the ideological assumptions of far-left academia, activist NGOs, and digital protest networks.
Final Assessment
The Young Turks is not merely a news organization—it is a progressive ideological apparatus designed to mobilize, radicalize, and reinforce leftist narratives for a digitally connected, secular, and activist-minded audience. It proudly discards journalistic neutrality in favor of direct political engagement. It speaks the language of revolution, not reform.
To its supporters, TYT is bold, brave, and willing to speak truth to power. It holds Democrats’ feet to the fire and serves as a digital sanctuary for progressives disillusioned by centrist compromise. But to its critics—including conservative Christians and defenders of America’s foundational ideals—TYT represents the most aggressive and unapologetic expression of Cultural Marxism in online media.
Its rhetorical style often substitutes outrage for argument, and moral posturing for reasoned analysis. It routinely demonizes political opponents, particularly Christians, constitutional conservatives, pro-life advocates, and supporters of the free market. The result is a broadcast model that promotes division over dialogue, activism over accuracy, and ideology over integrity.
Perhaps most damning is TYT’s pervasive hypocrisy—from union-busting and misogynistic comments to flip-flops on free speech and selective concern for truth. Despite branding itself as independent and revolutionary, it has embraced the very funding sources and power structures it once denounced. Its allegiance to the leftist cause often overrides its commitment to truth.
In the broader media ecosystem, The Young Turks plays a strategic role in normalizing radical progressive ideas, particularly among youth. It stands as a warning of what happens when news becomes a weapon, and truth becomes a tool of the tribe.
For conservative Americans who revere the Constitution, biblical ethics, and the nation’s founding principles, TYT belongs in the Hall of Shame—not simply because it disagrees, but because it militantly seeks to deconstruct the very pillars of ordered liberty.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
MMXXV
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” , “transition” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex. Unfortunately, we are forced to adopt the language of the left to discuss some topics without engaging in lengthy qualifying statements that make conversations awkward.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.