Francis Schaeffer was no ordinary theologian. Dressed in knickers and often sporting a goatee, he was as much a cultural philosopher as he was a Christian apologist. His greatest work, however, was not in lecture halls or on debate stages—it was in the cozy mountain chalet of L’Abri (“The Shelter”) in Huémoz, Switzerland. There, he opened his home to seekers, skeptics, and students from all over the world. His method was unique: he met people where they were, listened intently, and guided them—graciously yet firmly—to see the fractures in their worldviews.
Schaeffer’s apologetic approach was deeply relational. He believed in “taking the roof off” a person’s belief system—not to shame or destroy, but to help them feel the weight of its inconsistencies. Once the “line of despair” was reached, Schaeffer gently offered the Christian worldview, not as a theory, but as truth that made sense of reality, beauty, meaning, and morality. Those who stayed at L’Abri were not treated like projects; they joined family dinners, chopped wood, and drank hot cocoa while conversing by firelight. They saw the gospel lived.
This essay explores how Francis Schaeffer might have encountered and engaged a sincere young man devoted to the Iglesia Ni Cristo, a religious movement that claims exclusivity to truth. First, we’ll set the stage by understanding this worldview, then follow the dialogue that exposes its spiritual fault lines and points to the Savior.
The Worldview of Iglesia Ni Cristo: A False Restoration
Founded by Felix Y. Manalo in 1914, Iglesia Ni Cristo (or “Church of Christ”) is a Filipino-based religious group that teaches it is the only true church established by Christ. Manalo is regarded as God’s “last messenger,” fulfilling end-times prophecy. The group has millions of members worldwide, especially in the Philippines, the U.S., and parts of Asia and the Middle East.
Key Beliefs of Iglesia Ni Cristo:
- Jesus Christ is not God, but a created being and servant of God.
- The Holy Spirit is not a person, but the force of God’s will.
- Salvation is only through INC membership, obedience to its leadership, and good works.
- All other churches are apostate. Protestant and Catholic churches are viewed as corrupt and heretical.
- Scripture is true—but only as interpreted through INC authorities.
- Felix Manalo is the final messenger through whom God restored the true church.
Their Criticisms of Christianity:
- Trinitarianism is viewed as irrational and unscriptural.
- Protestantism’s diversity is seen as disunity and proof of apostasy.
- Evangelical Christianity is rejected for teaching “faith alone” without institutional submission.
Biblical Christianity’s Response:
- The Trinity is not polytheism but unity in diversity, clearly revealed in Scripture (Matthew 28:19).
- Jesus is fully God and fully man (John 1:1, Colossians 1:15–20).
- Salvation is by grace through faith, not by works or church membership (Ephesians 2:8–9).
- True unity is found in shared belief in the gospel, not in monolithic authoritarianism.
- No man after the apostles has the authority to redefine the church.
A Fictitional Meeting at L’Abri: Francis and Miguel
Scene: A late autumn afternoon. The Alps glow gold in the distance. In the rustic warmth of L’Abri, Francis Schaeffer sits across from Miguel, a 20-year-old engineering student from Manila, visiting Europe on break. Raised in Iglesia Ni Cristo, Miguel is thoughtful, articulate, and passionate about his beliefs.
Miguel:
“Dr. Schaeffer, I appreciate your hospitality. I know we have different beliefs, but I wanted to explain why I believe INC is the true church. We follow what the Bible really teaches—God is one, not three. Jesus was a man, the chosen servant of God, not God Himself. And God restored His church in the Philippines through Brother Felix Manalo, just as Isaiah 43 and Revelation 7 foretold.”
Schaeffer:
“I’m glad you’re here, Miguel. And I’m honored you’d share so sincerely. Let’s walk together through what you believe. May I ask—what makes you certain your interpretation is correct and that millions of others are wrong?”
Miguel:
“Because the Bible is clear, sir. And our leaders teach it faithfully. They show how the Trinity is not biblical—it came from pagan Rome. The apostles never taught it.”
Schaeffer:
“I see. You value Scripture—that’s good. But suppose you read a passage, and it doesn’t make sense unless Jesus is divine. Would you consider that perhaps the early church affirmed His deity not because of pagan influence, but because the Scripture demanded it?”
Miguel:
“Such as?”
Schaeffer:
“What do you make of John 1:1—‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God’? If Jesus is the Word, how is He not God?”
Miguel:
“Our ministers teach that it means Jesus was ‘a god’—a mighty being, but not the Almighty.”
Schaeffer:
“But doesn’t Scripture say elsewhere that there is only one true God, and no other (Isaiah 45:5)? If Jesus is ‘a god,’ and yet not God, then aren’t we back at polytheism?”
Miguel:
(Pauses) “But… we don’t worship Jesus as God. We honor Him as the Christ.”
Schaeffer:
“And yet He receives worship in the gospels (Matthew 14:33). He forgives sins (Mark 2:5–7). He says, ‘Before Abraham was, I AM’ (John 8:58). Those aren’t claims of a mere prophet, are they?”
Miguel:
(Quietly) “That’s what troubles me. Sometimes, I feel like our picture of Jesus is… too small.”
Schaeffer:
“Let me ask you, Miguel—do you feel fully confident that you are saved?”
Miguel:
“I try to obey the church. I attend worship, I avoid sin, I submit to our ministers. But I don’t always feel peace. Sometimes I fear I’ve failed.”
Schaeffer:
“That sounds exhausting. May I show you something beautiful? Romans 5:1 says, ‘Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.’ Not by works. Not by affiliation. By faith. That’s grace.”
Miguel:
“But if we’re saved by faith alone, what keeps people from sinning?”
Schaeffer:
“A true believer is not saved to sin, but from it. Grace transforms the heart. You obey, not to earn favor, but because you’ve been made new (Ezekiel 36:26–27). You live from love, not fear.”
Miguel:
“INC says only our church can give that.”
Schaeffer:
“And yet Jesus said, ‘Come to me, all who are weary… and I will give you rest’ (Matthew 11:28). He didn’t say come to an institution, but to Him. That’s the invitation I offer you, Miguel—not to abandon community, but to embrace Christ as Savior and God.”
Miguel:
(With tears) “I don’t know if I can leave everything I’ve known…”
Schaeffer:
“I understand. It takes time. Let’s walk together. Ask God to show you truth. And know this—He is not far from any of us.”
Conclusion: Love, Truth, and the Hope of Redemption
Francis Schaeffer’s method wasn’t quick-fix evangelism. It was patient, thoughtful, relational. He didn’t just refute falsehood—he loved the person trapped in it. In this fictional dialogue, we see how Schaeffer’s approach gently but powerfully exposes the cracks in Iglesia Ni Cristo’s worldview and points to the glorious grace of Christ.
As believers, we must learn to do the same. Study the Scriptures. Understand the beliefs of those we engage. Ask gentle, penetrating questions. Let the truth do its work.
And above all—pray. Pray that God, who is rich in mercy, might open blind eyes and soften hardened hearts (Ephesians 2:2–10). Only He can raise the spiritually dead.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots.
You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
If you have evidence that I am wrong about a material statement of fact, provide the evidence and I will gladly review it and make revisions if merited. Obviously, there are some assertions that are matters of opinion that I will not change, but I always strive to be truthful.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.
I recommend these Youtube channels and commentators for good content on politics and news from a Christian and/or conservative worldview: Albert Mohler, Allie Beth Stuckey, Bill O’Reilly, CBN News, Hugh Hewitt, John Anderson Media (Australia), Nick Freitas, Ruthless Podcast (language warning), Scott Jennings, The Hot Zone with Chuck Holton, Vince Dao, and Verdict with Ted Cruz.
For livestreaming of political protests and riots by conservative commentators, check out Nate Friedman, Cam Higby, James Klug, and Nick Shirley. I don’t agree with the perspectives of all these commentators and the language of protesters is often obscene. Most news outlets will not cover these illegal assemblies, though, because it doesn’t promote their narrative.
Depictions of Jesus Christ are used in some illustrations. I realize that some including conservative Presbyterians consider this to be idolatry. I respectfully disagree with their position on this matter as the commandment forbids worshiping such depictions, and I do not worship these illustrations.