On March 22, 2021, the peaceful city of Boulder, Colorado was shaken by a tragic mass shooting at a King Soopers grocery store. Ten people were killed, including a brave police officer who rushed into danger. As details were still emerging, major media figures and progressive commentators rushed to judgment—not about the facts, but about the race and presumed motivations of the shooter. The media’s deception in this case wasn’t merely a mistake. It was part of a broader pattern: exploiting tragedy to advance a preconceived narrative rooted in identity politics and Neo-Marxist ideology.
This blog post will expose how the media misrepresented the Boulder shooting, falsely assigned racial and political motives, and then quietly retreated from the narrative when the truth was revealed. The goal was not to report facts—but to shape public perception.
The Immediate Spin: Racial Assumptions Without Evidence
Within hours of the shooting, prominent journalists, commentators, and social media personalities filled the airwaves and timelines with speculation. Despite no information about the suspect’s identity, a widespread assumption took hold: the shooter must be a white male, likely motivated by racism or white supremacy.
CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, and numerous Twitter influencers implied or outright stated that the tragedy fit the mold of “another angry white man” lashing out violently in a society poisoned by systemic racism. The narrative had been prepared in advance; the event was simply waiting to be slotted into the script.
Activists and media figures called attention to the racial identity of the victims (without evidence), suggested links to other racially motivated attacks, and began moralizing about the threat of white male violence—all before the suspect’s name had even been released.
The Reality: A Narrative Collapses
The truth broke the narrative.
The shooter was revealed to be Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, a 21-year-old Syrian-born Muslim immigrant. Far from a white supremacist, Alissa was a Middle Eastern man with a history of paranoia, social isolation, and possible mental illness. Reports showed no political manifesto, no evidence of racial motivation, and no links to far-right extremism.
And just like that, the story disappeared from mainstream coverage. No apologies were issued for the false racial assumptions. No public retractions were aired with the same energy that propelled the original narrative. The headlines went silent—not because the story lost relevance, but because the facts contradicted the ideology.
Media Malpractice: A Pattern of Premature Judgment
This wasn’t an isolated mistake. It’s part of an ongoing pattern of media malpractice:
- In the Atlanta spa shootings, the press pushed the “anti-Asian hate crime” angle, despite the shooter’s stated sexual addiction motive.
- In the Highland Park mass shooting, early speculation tied the incident to white supremacy before facts were confirmed.
- In the Ma’Khia Bryant case, journalists ignored video evidence showing she was attacking another black girl with a knife, instead claiming police had shot her “just for being black.”
In each of these cases, the media framed the incident around a racial narrative before all facts were known. If those facts later contradicted the narrative, they were downplayed or ignored.
Constructing a Narrative: The Neo-Marxist Lens
At the heart of this deceit is a lens borrowed from Neo-Marxist theory. In this framework:
- Whiteness is synonymous with systemic oppression.
- Male implies toxic privilege.
- Guns represent institutionalized violence.
- Christian or conservative values are coded as complicit in white supremacy.
The media uses this interpretive grid to assign meaning to every event. The facts are bent to fit the theory. If a tragedy can be exploited to further this narrative—such as a supposed white male shooter killing people of color—it becomes headline material. If the facts contradict the narrative, the story is dropped.
The Boulder shooting didn’t fit the framework once the perpetrator’s identity was revealed. Therefore, the narrative was quietly shelved.
The Double Standard: Silence When the Facts Inconvenience
Imagine the media reaction if a white male Christian had been the shooter. There would have been days of coverage about domestic terrorism, racial violence, and “the threat of white nationalism.” Congressional hearings might have followed. Entire communities would have been vilified.
Instead, because the shooter was a Muslim immigrant, the mainstream media shifted focus to mental health and gun control—completely abandoning the racial storyline. No national debate on immigrant crime. No investigation into cultural or religious motives. Silence.
This double standard reveals the ideological corruption of legacy media. Their goal isn’t justice—it’s social transformation. Tragedies are no longer moments of mourning but tools for reeducation and indoctrination.
Social Media’s Role: Echo Chamber of Accusation
Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook amplified the false assumptions. Verified journalists and activists pounced on the shooting to push their favored narratives. Posts linking the shooter to white privilege and racism garnered tens of thousands of likes and retweets before the suspect was identified.
But when those claims were proven false, there were no equal efforts to retract or correct. The damage was done. The lie had traveled halfway around the world before the truth got its boots on.
The Consequences: Division, Distrust, and Delusion
This kind of media deception has serious consequences:
- It fosters racial division by fueling resentment based on lies.
- It discredits legitimate concerns about violence by making everything about race and power.
- It creates cynicism about journalism and institutions meant to inform the public.
- It spreads confusion about what is true, encouraging people to live in ideological bubbles.
And worst of all, it exploits the victims of tragedy—turning their deaths into political capital for cultural revolutionaries.
Conclusion: Truth Matters More Than Narrative
The Boulder shooting should have been a moment for national unity, grieving, and sober reflection on violence and mental health. Instead, it was hijacked by ideologues who saw it as another opportunity to score points in the culture war.
As Christians, conservatives, and citizens committed to truth, we must demand better. We must call out media deception, reject identity-based speculation, and stand firm against attempts to warp reality through ideological manipulation.
The truth matters. It always has. It always will. And when it comes to preserving a just society, truth—not narrative—is the only foundation that will hold.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots.
You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
If you have evidence that I am wrong about a material statement of fact, provide the evidence and I will gladly review it and make revisions if merited. Obviously, there are some assertions that are matters of opinion that I will not change, but I always strive to be truthful.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.
I recommend these Youtube channels and commentators for good content on politics and news from a Christian and/or conservative worldview: Albert Mohler, Allie Beth Stuckey, Bill O’Reilly, CBN News, Hugh Hewitt, John Anderson Media (Australia), Nick Freitas, Ruthless Podcast (language warning), Scott Jennings, The Hot Zone with Chuck Holton, Vince Dao, and Verdict with Ted Cruz.
For livestreaming of political protests and riots by conservative commentators, check out Nate Friedman, Cam Higby, James Klug, and Nick Shirley. I don’t agree with the perspectives of all these commentators and the language of protesters is often obscene. Most news outlets will not cover these illegal assemblies, though, because it doesn’t promote their narrative.
Depictions of Jesus Christ are used in some illustrations. I realize that some including conservative Presbyterians consider this to be idolatry. I respectfully disagree with their position on this matter as the commandment forbids worshiping such depictions, and I do not worship these illustrations.