CBS News holds a place of historic prestige in American journalism. For generations, it was known as the “Tiffany Network”—a reference to its polish and class. Names like Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, and Dan Rather defined the idea of a trustworthy broadcaster for millions of Americans. Even now, CBS retains a certain aura of institutional gravity that makes it seem more restrained, less sensationalist, and more balanced than newer entrants into the media world.
But that perception is a relic of a bygone era.
In practice, CBS News today is a highly curated vehicle for progressive narratives, infused with the language of equity, inclusion, and consensus politics. Though it wears the suit and tie of tradition, its editorial lens is culturally left, often following the lead of activist voices in academia, entertainment, and politics. The difference between CBS and more openly leftist outlets like MSNBC or CNN is not one of ideology—but of tone and method.
CBS does not rage against the Right. It nudges, frames, and filters, ensuring that left-of-center worldviews are normalized as centrist and reasonable. Its soft-spoken anchors, clean visuals, and carefully modulated scripts cloak a worldview that has drifted significantly from the values of traditional America.
Ownership and Worldview
CBS News is owned by Paramount Global (formerly ViacomCBS), a media conglomerate that controls major entertainment properties including Paramount Pictures, MTV, Showtime, BET, and Nickelodeon. This ownership structure embeds CBS News within a broader entertainment complex that leans heavily toward cultural liberalism, identity politics, and social progressivism.
Paramount Global has publicly committed itself to:
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) frameworks in hiring, production, and storytelling
- LGBTQ+ advocacy, especially in children’s and youth programming
- Climate activism, partnering with global environmental initiatives
- Race-centered initiatives, including internal audits and content reformulations
CBS News mirrors these priorities by carefully integrating them into its coverage—not through advocacy journalism in the style of left-wing blogs, but through story choice, terminology, and absence of dissenting perspectives.
Its worldview can be described as elite progressive pragmatism: cosmopolitan, secular, managerial, and emotionally resonant. Traditionalist perspectives—on religion, gender, the family, and national sovereignty—are rarely allowed to speak on their own terms. Instead, they are filtered, paraphrased, or set up as contrasts to enlightened modernity.
CBS News doesn’t appear radical because it outsources its radicalism to academic sources, foundation-funded “experts,” and elite-approved institutions. Its deference to “consensus” authority has become a conduit for Cultural Marxist assumptions to enter American homes with the full production value of institutional credibility.
Typical Claims and Outlook
CBS News consistently projects an image of sobriety and seriousness. Its reporting emphasizes “facts” and “truth,” and it tends to avoid overt editorializing in the way opinion-heavy platforms like MSNBC or CNN do. But this restraint masks a deep editorial alignment with progressive orthodoxies.
Its flagship programs—CBS Evening News, 60 Minutes, CBS Mornings, and Face the Nation—frequently:
- Frame conservative and religious perspectives as outdated, controversial, or harmful
- Promote LGBTQ+ causes, abortion rights, climate activism, and social justice as moral imperatives
- Defer to globalist and technocratic authorities (e.g., UN, WHO, CDC, IPCC) as arbiters of truth
- Present woke corporate trends (DEI, ESG, gender identity training) as social progress
- Exclude dissenting views by treating them as misinformation, extremism, or “conspiracy theories”
Rather than present both sides of contentious issues, CBS curates which voices are allowed to define a story’s terms. This practice doesn’t always look biased—but it decides what the audience is allowed to consider rational, normal, or factual.
The tone is civil. The language is moderate. But the message is clear: there is only one enlightened way to think, and CBS will deliver it to you professionally.
Issue-by-Issue Breakdown
The position of a media outlet on these twenty issues serves as good litmus tests to determine whether the outlet belongs on the woke, left, “Progressive” side of the political aisle or the right, conservative political side of the aisle.
It is evident that this media outlet belongs on the left side of the aisle.
1. Election Integrity and Voter Laws
CBS News has echoed Democratic claims that voter ID laws and redistricting are tools of voter suppression. Coverage of election integrity efforts often dismisses legitimate concerns—especially surrounding mail-in ballots or machine vulnerabilities—as “baseless” or “debunked,” while rarely airing substantial critiques from legal experts or election officials with alternative views.
2. Abortion and Reproductive Rights
CBS portrays abortion as healthcare and as a fundamental women’s right. After the Dobbs decision, the network featured numerous stories on the hardship caused by “abortion bans,” but gave little airtime to pro-life women or arguments about fetal personhood. Language like “forced birth” is used, while terms like “unborn child” are generally avoided.
3. Gender Identity and Transgender Policies
The network consistently affirms gender ideology. CBS Mornings and CBSN Digital have aired sympathetic features on transgender youth, nonbinary identities, and drag culture. Medical and legal pushback is rarely covered. When it is, such coverage typically frames opponents as driven by fear or prejudice.
4. Race and Systemic Racism
CBS coverage assumes the reality of systemic racism and white privilege. Stories on policing, education, income gaps, and housing are routinely filtered through this lens. Historical complexity and alternative views—such as those emphasizing family breakdown, personal responsibility, or cultural change—are largely excluded.
5. Climate Change and Energy Policy
CBS aligns tightly with climate alarmism. Reports treat global warming as an existential threat, showcasing disasters and activist solutions, often without meaningful debate. The economic or reliability concerns of alternative views are not given equal weight. Fossil fuel companies are typically villainized.
6. Immigration and Border Security
The humanitarian framing dominates CBS immigration coverage. The focus is on families, children, and “undocumented” individuals, not border security, crime, or sovereignty. Biden-era border failures are covered lightly and sympathetically, while Trump-era enforcement was presented as cruel or xenophobic.
7. Israel and the Middle East Conflict
CBS often adopts the moral equivalence model, showing Israeli airstrikes alongside Palestinian civilian deaths, with minimal exploration of Hamas’s role or terrorist infrastructure. The language of “occupation” is used selectively, and the security concerns of Israeli citizens are often muted.
8. Second Amendment and Gun Control
CBS advocates for gun reform through emotional storytelling—school shootings, grieving parents, and urgent calls for action. Defensive gun uses are underreported. Gun owners and Second Amendment supporters are rarely interviewed, and when they are, their views are framed as dangerous or fringe.
9. LGBTQ+ Rights and Religious Liberty
CBS strongly supports LGBTQ+ normalization. It frequently celebrates same-sex marriage, Pride events, and transgender milestones. Religious liberty cases—such as those involving bakers, schools, or adoption agencies—are typically presented as discrimination cloaked in religion rather than as constitutional disputes.
10. COVID-19 Policy and Mandates
CBS promoted all government guidelines without meaningful skepticism—lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and especially vaccination. Alternative views, even from medical professionals, were often labeled misinformation. Adverse events and civil liberty implications were underreported.
11. Policing and Criminal Justice
CBS has adopted the “reform” language of progressive activists while preserving a more respectable tone than overtly activist networks. Their coverage of police incidents—especially since George Floyd—tends to assume racial bias as a given. Violent riots during the 2020 BLM protests were downplayed or described as “mostly peaceful.” Efforts to highlight police heroism or the consequences of de-policing are far less common.
12. Education and Parental Rights
Stories related to education often quote unions, superintendents, and progressive educators, while skeptical of parent-led reform efforts. Laws like Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act are framed with activist language like “Don’t Say Gay,” while underlying parental concerns about gender theory and critical race theory are rarely examined fairly.
13. Censorship and Big Tech
CBS tends to frame content moderation by tech platforms as a necessity for “safety” and combating “misinformation,” particularly during COVID and election seasons. Reports on censorship of dissenting voices are minimal, and the outlet has largely ignored evidence of federal government collusion with Big Tech to suppress protected speech.
14. January 6 and Political Violence
Like its peers, CBS has portrayed January 6 as a domestic terror event and a grave threat to democracy. It frequently features lawmakers’ emotional accounts, committee narratives, and comparisons to 9/11. However, it has provided minimal coverage of government overreach, due process violations, or contrasting responses to far-left violence.
15. Corporate Wokeness and ESG
CBS covers corporate DEI initiatives positively, often highlighting business leaders who embrace LGBTQ+ causes, climate commitments, and “equity” pledges. Detractors of ESG, including conservative state officials and shareholder activists, receive brief or negative framing, if covered at all.
16. Hunter Biden and Political Corruption
The network downplayed the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020 and has since been slow and tepid in its follow-up. When reported, the narrative often focuses on Hunter’s personal struggles or discredits whistleblowers. Meanwhile, alleged pay-to-play schemes involving Joe Biden and foreign actors are treated with extreme caution, if not silence.
17. Trump and the Republican Party
CBS’s reporting on Trump and his allies is consistently negative, focusing on alleged criminality, rhetorical danger, and chaos. Even relatively moderate Republicans are scrutinized if they align with populist causes. In contrast, establishment Democrats are often described with favorable language—e.g., “pragmatic,” “resilient,” “experienced.”
18. Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences
CBS lamented the Supreme Court’s decision ending race-based college admissions, frequently amplifying student activists, liberal professors, and DEI professionals. Asian-American plaintiffs and constitutional scholars on the opposing side received little attention. The narrative emphasized “equity setbacks” over legal principles.
19. International Institutions and Sovereignty
CBS holds global institutions in high regard. Whether on health, climate, or diplomacy, bodies like the UN, WHO, and WEF are cited as authoritative. Nationalist resistance to such institutions is typically framed as isolationist, dangerous, or rooted in ignorance.
20. Culture War Issues
CBS subtly advances the progressive side of the culture war under the guise of modernity and kindness. It features drag story hour, LGBTQ+ parenting, DEI in the workplace, and critiques of masculinity—rarely platforming traditional Christian perspectives. Traditional sexual ethics, family structures, and gender roles are viewed as throwbacks or problems.
Cultural Marxism and Ideological Influence
CBS News, though outwardly “mainstream” in tone and aesthetic, functions as a stealth vehicle for Cultural Marxist assumptions. It refrains from the raw, revolutionary language of the activist Left, but its reporting nonetheless reflects a consistent ideological pattern rooted in redefining power structures and social norms.
Cultural Marxism reframes all relationships in terms of oppressors vs. oppressed—a lens CBS subtly but consistently applies:
- Race becomes a matter of structural guilt and redress.
- Gender becomes an oppressive binary in need of deconstruction.
- The family becomes a site of outdated hierarchy rather than protection.
- National identity becomes synonymous with xenophobia.
- Religious conviction becomes dangerous when it resists expressive individualism.
This ideological framework is not openly confessed on air—but its presence is unmistakable in how CBS selects stories, frames narratives, and filters language. For example:
- It rarely features cultural conservatives as credible moral voices.
- It amplifies voices that celebrate sexual autonomy and personal authenticity.
- It leverages emotional storytelling to bypass rational disagreement.
- It treats traditionalist views as relics of an unenlightened past.
By presenting progressive values as commonsense and nonpartisan, CBS contributes to the erasure of the historic American consensus—not with shouts or slogans, but with curated calm and polished production. That makes it all the more potent.
Notable Journalists, Editorial Practices, and Scandals
Prominent Personalities
- Norah O’Donnell – Anchor of the CBS Evening News, she projects authority and restraint but routinely reinforces progressive talking points, especially on race and gender. Her coverage of abortion and social policy leans left with emotional emphasis rather than critical balance.
- Margaret Brennan – Host of Face the Nation, Brennan is incisive and prepared, but her interviews often adopt the default progressive premise. Republican guests are frequently challenged harder than Democrats, and issues like parental rights or election reform are framed as “controversial” even when widely supported.
- Gayle King – Co-host of CBS Mornings, King frequently serves as a cultural ambassador for the progressive elite. From her friendly interviews with liberal celebrities to her focus on race and gender identity, she epitomizes the emotional validation model of news: what matters is how people feel, not the underlying principles.
Scandals and Ethical Lapses
- Dan Rather and the Bush Memos (2004)
Perhaps the most infamous scandal in CBS history. Dan Rather aired a story during the 2004 presidential campaign claiming George W. Bush had dodged military service—based on documents that were later proven to be forgeries. Rather defended the story, but it was a serious breach of journalistic ethics. CBS was forced to apologize, and Rather eventually left the network. - Charlie Rose Sexual Harassment (2017)
Longtime anchor Charlie Rose was fired after multiple allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct. The case exposed the double standard in progressive institutions, where public virtue signaling masked private abuse. CBS’s handling of the case—initially slow and defensive—was criticized. - Uneven Political Coverage
Numerous media analysts, including the Media Research Center and independent critics, have noted CBS’s pattern of asymmetrical scrutiny—tough on conservatives, lenient on progressives. This has contributed to the network’s growing loss of credibility among independent and conservative viewers. - Underreporting Hunter Biden and Censorship
CBS was slow to acknowledge the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story and rarely followed up on allegations of corruption. Its silence helped shape the 2020 election narrative, not through lies, but through omission—a powerful tool of soft propaganda.
Conclusion: CBS News and the Loss of American Trust
CBS News may still carry the aesthetic authority of old-school journalism, but its editorial soul has shifted dramatically. Its allegiance is no longer to traditional journalistic neutrality or civic responsibility. Instead, it aligns with the moral consensus of the progressive elite—a blend of technocratic rule, therapeutic culture, and identity-based grievance politics.
It packages this ideology with unmatched professionalism. Its anchors speak calmly. Its sets are tasteful. Its transitions are smooth. But its message is clear: the future is progressive, the past is problematic, and your faith, family, and freedoms must yield to “inclusion.”
CBS’s power lies in its ability to normalize radical change without ever appearing radical. That is why it deserves a place in the Hall of Shame—not for shouting bias from the rooftops, but for whispering it into the hearts of everyday Americans under the guise of neutrality.
For Christians, conservatives, and patriots who love truth and tradition, the lesson is clear: don’t confuse civility with credibility. And don’t mistake institutional polish for moral authority.
CBS News, once the gold standard, now stands as a gilded messenger of soft revolution.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
MMXXV
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” , “transition” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex. Unfortunately, we are forced to adopt the language of the left to discuss some topics without engaging in lengthy qualifying statements that make conversations awkward.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.