CNBC bills itself as “the recognized world leader in business news,” a reputation built on real-time stock market coverage, interviews with corporate executives, and financial commentary aimed at investors and business leaders. To the casual viewer, CNBC might seem like a bastion of free-market capitalism—championing entrepreneurship, profit, and innovation.
But behind the tickers and suits lies a very different reality. CNBC is not a neutral marketplace of economic ideas—it is a media arm of the managerial elite, combining economic liberalism with social progressivism and technocratic globalism. While it promotes wealth creation, it rarely defends the moral foundations of free enterprise, such as individual liberty, private property, or personal responsibility.
In fact, CNBC has increasingly become a platform for corporate wokeness, championing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives, identity politics, and technocratic solutions that align with the values of the progressive ruling class. It doesn’t push for small government or traditional values; it cheers on big corporations as long as they’re on board with leftist social policies.
In the grand spectrum of media outlets, CNBC may speak the language of capitalism—but it speaks it with a Harvard accent and a progressive conscienCoce. For conservative Christians and free-market defenders, this poses a unique threat: the co-opting of economic liberty to advance cultural leftism.
Ownership and Worldview
CNBC is owned by NBCUniversal, which itself is a subsidiary of Comcast Corporation, one of the largest media and telecommunications conglomerates in the world. Its sister outlets include NBC News, MSNBC, and Telemundo, all of which lean decisively leftward in their cultural and political outlook.
While CNBC caters to a business-minded audience, it does so through the lens of elite institutional consensus. That consensus—shared by Ivy League economists, globalist think tanks, World Economic Forum operatives, and ESG investment firms—is not conservative in the traditional sense. It is statist, technocratic, and socially progressive.
What This Means in Practice:
- The network defers to central banks, international institutions, and corporate leaders rather than free-market thinkers or constitutional originalists.
- It is heavily influenced by the Davos mindset, often giving airtime to figures like Klaus Schwab, BlackRock executives, and climate finance gurus who advocate for managed economies and sustainability mandates.
- Its reporting rarely questions corporate-government collusion—especially when that collusion promotes climate initiatives, DEI mandates, or COVID-era technocratic controls.
- Traditional moral frameworks—biblical ethics, religious liberty, or family-centric economic policy—are nearly invisible in its coverage.
In essence, CNBC reflects the values of the global managerial class, not Main Street America. It gives voice to Wall Street progressivism, a worldview that favors open borders, soft authoritarianism in the name of safety, and cultural revolution by way of corporate compliance.
Typical Claims and Outlook
CNBC’s coverage is cloaked in the aesthetics of markets and money. With anchors in tailored suits and the Dow Jones scrolling across the screen, the network appears to be all business. But the deeper content reveals an increasingly ideological agenda. CNBC no longer merely reports on the economy—it actively frames economic questions through a progressive worldview.
The channel emphasizes sustainability, equity, and technocratic solutions to problems—prioritizing narratives about climate change, gender pay gaps, and racial disparities in wealth. The economy isn’t covered as a web of voluntary transactions driven by personal responsibility—it’s covered as a system in need of central correction and government-nudged fairness.
“Capitalism” is often only praised when it is regulated, socially conscious, and aligned with progressive values. Conservative economic voices—especially those favoring deregulation, strong national borders, traditional family incentives, or Christian moral foundations—are nearly absent.
CNBC rarely platforms small business owners or everyday Americans concerned about inflation, taxation, or government overreach. Instead, it showcases corporate executives, central bankers, tech oligarchs, and bureaucrats who see the world through the lens of global coordination and social engineering.
Let’s walk through how CNBC handles the following 20 key issues that expose the political leanings of a news outlet.
Issue-by-Issue Breakdown
The position of a media outlet on these twenty issues serves as good litmus tests to determine whether the outlet belongs on the woke, left, “Progressive” side of the political aisle or the right, conservative political side of the aisle.
It is evident that this media outlet belongs on the left side of the aisle.
1. Election Integrity and Voter Laws
CNBC echoes the mainstream progressive claim that voter ID laws and election audits are tools of “voter suppression.” In its coverage, election integrity measures are often treated as Republican efforts to disenfranchise minorities, with little attention to concerns about fraud or ballot security.
2. Abortion and Reproductive Rights
The network largely treats abortion as a settled civil right and rarely gives serious airtime to pro-life arguments. CNBC covers abortion more from a legal and economic frame than a moral one—but still sides with abortion access, especially when it intersects with “women in the workforce” narratives.
3. Gender Identity and Transgender Policies
CNBC embraces corporate alignment with gender ideology. It praises companies that support gender transitions, celebrates Pride campaigns, and rarely covers the harms of transitioning—especially among minors. When states pass laws protecting girls’ sports or banning gender surgeries for kids, CNBC frames them as discriminatory.
4. Race and Systemic Racism
Coverage of race is filtered through a DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) framework. The network highlights disparities in income and employment as proof of systemic racism, often ignoring cultural or behavioral causes. Woke investing, “racial equity audits,” and corporate reparation programs are treated favorably.
5. Climate Change and Energy Policy
Few networks are more committed to climate alarmism than CNBC. It consistently pushes the narrative of an impending environmental collapse, cheers on ESG mandates, and promotes green energy subsidies. Oil, coal, and gas industries are villainized, and market-based environmental solutions are overshadowed by regulatory praise.
6. Immigration and Border Security
CNBC favors open-border policies, focusing on the economic contributions of migrants while downplaying security or cultural concerns. Coverage of immigration often adopts a humanitarian lens and treats enforcement policies as xenophobic or harmful to business.
7. Israel and the Middle East Conflict
The network maintains a more corporate-globalist posture than outright hostility toward Israel, but its coverage often takes on a diplomatic neutrality that subtly leans toward “both sides-ism.” When Israel defends itself, CNBC tends to highlight economic fallout and international criticism rather than the legitimacy of self-defense.
8. Second Amendment and Gun Control
Gun rights are treated with skepticism, especially after mass shootings. CNBC echoes progressive calls for gun control and often uses corporate pressure (like credit card tracking of gun purchases or ESG anti-gun investing) as tools for circumventing Second Amendment protections.
9. LGBTQ+ Rights and Religious Liberty
The channel praises corporations that embrace Pride initiatives and penalizes those that don’t. Religious objections to LGBTQ+ policies are viewed as outdated or bigoted. Religious liberty stories are only covered when progressives claim their liberties are being violated.
10. COVID-19 Policy and Mandates
Throughout the pandemic, CNBC was a vocal supporter of mandates, lockdowns, and centralized health control. It backed vaccine passports and vilified dissenters, especially those concerned about religious freedom or economic fallout. The network rarely questioned CDC or WHO authority.
11. Policing and Criminal Justice
CNBC often frames criminal justice through the lens of “economic injustice.” It highlights racial disparities in arrests and incarceration, favorably covers corporate partnerships with bail funds and “anti-policing” organizations, and supports decarceration efforts. Police reform is consistently presented as a moral imperative.
12. Education and Parental Rights
While CNBC does not cover education policy in depth, its coverage reflects support for woke education trends when they intersect with economics. For example, it supports DEI-based hiring practices in education, resists parental input on curriculum when it hinders “inclusion,” and promotes gender ideology training in schools as “progressive HR policy.”
13. Censorship and Big Tech
Despite covering tech stocks and corporate competition, CNBC rarely criticizes censorship by Big Tech companies. It often praises content moderation policies on misinformation and hate speech, echoing progressive arguments that social media needs more—not less—regulation to enforce “truth.”
14. January 6 and Political Violence
The January 6 Capitol riot was heavily covered by CNBC with language mirroring MSNBC and CNN. It was framed as a grave threat to democracy, with significant attention to stock market reactions, corporate condemnations of “insurrection,” and political fallout for Republicans. In contrast, the 2020 BLM riots received comparatively restrained economic analysis.
15. Corporate Wokeness and ESG
This is where CNBC most clearly reveals its progressive lean. ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) is not just reported on—it is actively promoted. CNBC elevates ESG-friendly CEOs, cheers on DEI trends, and rarely gives airtime to critics who warn about politicized investing or ideological overreach in boardrooms.
16. Hunter Biden and Political Corruption
While MSNBC actively ran interference for the Biden family, CNBC practiced avoidance. Stories about Hunter Biden were underreported or given a financial angle that stripped away political context. The network did not investigate the implications of alleged foreign influence or influence-peddling schemes.
17. Trump and the Republican Party
CNBC’s coverage of Donald Trump has been sharply negative, particularly in relation to trade policy, nationalism, and regulatory rollback. Populist conservatives are cast as economically reckless, culturally dangerous, or anti-science. The network prefers Mitt Romney-style Republicans—business-friendly, socially moderate, and compliant with elite norms.
18. Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences
The network opposed the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against race-based admissions, expressing concern about the “talent pipeline” for elite corporations. DEI hiring and quota-based promotion are treated as positive business trends. Opposition to race preferences is often framed as “reactionary” or economically short-sighted.
19. International Institutions and Sovereignty
CNBC reveres global institutions. It reports positively on the World Economic Forum, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and United Nations. Nationalist leaders or policies are met with suspicion, especially when they challenge trade agreements, climate pacts, or open-border policies.
20. Culture War Issues
CNBC rarely uses the phrase “culture war,” but its positioning is unmistakable. It favors abortion access, LGBTQ+ rights, DEI mandates, and censorship of “hate speech.” Corporate actors resisting these trends—such as Chick-fil-A in its earlier stance or Elon Musk’s support of free speech—are often treated as provocateurs or liabilities.
Cultural Marxism and Ideological Influence
While CNBC may not look like your typical leftist network, its worldview is increasingly shaped by the soft but pervasive influence of Cultural Marxism—particularly in how it reinterprets economic activity through a moral and identity-based lens.
Instead of advocating for markets rooted in moral law, personal liberty, and Judeo-Christian ethics, CNBC has adopted a technocratic moralism that views economic systems as needing correction by enlightened elites—primarily for the sake of social equity, environmental justice, and global coordination.
This manifests in several ways:
- Class and Identity Overlap: The network covers class issues (wealth gaps, CEO pay, housing inequality) not as purely economic phenomena, but as expressions of systemic injustice rooted in race, gender, and legacy privilege. It supports wealth redistribution schemes under the language of “economic equity” rather than voluntary charity or productivity reward.
- Corporations as Cultural Agents: Instead of being neutral economic actors, companies are expected to perform progressive morality—by hiring based on identity quotas, taking political stands on social issues, and silencing dissenting voices on their platforms or within their structures.
- Deconstruction of Norms: Like other Cultural Marxist-influenced platforms, CNBC treats traditional economic arrangements—such as the male-led household, privately-run education, or intergenerational wealth building—as potentially unjust. The goal is equity of outcome, not equality of opportunity.
- Technocratic Utopianism: The network exhibits a deep faith in the ability of data, bureaucracy, and elite institutions to engineer better societies. It frequently platforms WEF-style speakers who promote “reimagining capitalism” as a tool for “social transformation.”
Though delivered in a polished, corporate voice, this ideology shares the fundamental assumptions of Cultural Marxism: that the West’s traditional systems—including capitalism, the family, religion, and national sovereignty—are oppressive relics that must be replaced with managed progressivism.
Hosts, Scandals, and Public Persona
Notable Hosts and Commentators
- Andrew Ross Sorkin – Co-anchor of Squawk Box and columnist for The New York Times, Sorkin exemplifies CNBC’s ideological bent. He is a frequent proponent of ESG investing and corporate social activism. Sorkin often praises woke CEOs and criticizes populist figures, especially on the right.
- Jim Cramer – Perhaps the most recognizable CNBC personality, Cramer hosts Mad Money, blending stock analysis with theatrical delivery. Though often seen as apolitical, Cramer has promoted vaccine mandates, ESG trends, and anti-Trump rhetoric, aligning him with technocratic progressive views masked as economic expertise.
- Shepard Smith (formerly) – His tenure at CNBC was emblematic of the network’s shift toward overt liberalism. His show, The News with Shepard Smith, injected MSNBC-style editorializing into what was formerly a market-focused network.
Noteworthy Scandals and Controversies
- COVID Investment Conflicts – CNBC commentators and guests were repeatedly accused of promoting panic narratives during COVID-19 while benefiting from market volatility and government bailouts. Criticism arose over the cozy relationship between CNBC and Wall Street insiders who profited from pandemic-driven stimulus.
- Cramer’s Flip-Flopping and Conflicts – Jim Cramer has faced frequent scrutiny for shifting positions on stocks and praising companies shortly before their collapse (e.g., Bear Stearns in 2008). Critics argue he misleads the public while insulating himself from consequences.
- Platforming of Woke CEOs and BlackRock Executives – The network gave uncritical airtime to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and others advocating for ESG mandates—despite mounting criticism that such investment strategies sacrifice fiduciary duty in favor of ideological activism.
- Davos Echo Chamber – CNBC regularly sends teams to cover the World Economic Forum in Davos, where it celebrates the unelected global elite’s efforts to “reshape capitalism.” The network rarely challenges the anti-democratic implications of corporate-political convergence.
Public Persona
CNBC’s public image is a blend of Wall Street authority and Ivy League polish. To the average viewer, it feels like the serious voice of American capitalism. But to those listening closely, its loyalties lie not with small business, middle-class families, or constitutional freedom—but with elite technocrats, woke financiers, and global bureaucrats.
Its messaging appeals to a demographic that trusts institutions, fears populism, and conflates social progress with corporate compliance. It is capitalism, but without the Christian conscience.
Conclusion: The Face of the Managerial Left
CNBC occupies a peculiar place in the American media ecosystem. It is not MSNBC, shouting about injustice. It is not The New York Times, moralizing in print. Nor is it Democracy Now!, rallying street-level activists.
Instead, CNBC is the boardroom’s progressive conscience, the voice of those who still wear suits but speak in the slogans of social justice and global governance. It markets radical ideas in respectable language, packaging Cultural Marxism not as revolution but as “responsible investing,” “equity metrics,” and “corporate citizenship.”
It speaks for a class that believes it should rule—not because of democratic legitimacy or moral authority, but because it holds the data, the capital, and the credentials. It preaches redistribution from the private jet. It enforces compliance through capital markets. And it measures virtue by how thoroughly one conforms to elite orthodoxy.
For the Christian conservative, CNBC presents a profound challenge. It is not obviously hostile. It is not openly blasphemous. But its silent assumptions—that truth is managed, liberty is negotiable, and tradition is expendable—are deeply at odds with biblical Christianity.
It celebrates wealth—but not the wisdom to steward it.
It praises inclusion—but not the integrity to defend truth.
It promotes freedom—but only if it serves their “social good.”
What we’re left with is not a voice for free enterprise, but a media outlet that has fused capitalism and progressivism into a new form of soft tyranny—where the market becomes the mechanism for moral coercion and worldview enforcement.
CNBC doesn’t seek to destroy the free market.
It seeks to remake it in the image of the Left.
And in doing so, it turns wealth into a weapon—not of liberty, but of control.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
MMXXV
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” , “transition” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex. Unfortunately, we are forced to adopt the language of the left to discuss some topics without engaging in lengthy qualifying statements that make conversations awkward.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.