Saul Alinsky is not a household name to most Americans, but his ideas have profoundly shaped modern political activism, especially on the left. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were heavily influenced by him.
His book Rules for Radicals, published in 1971, serves as a tactical manual for those seeking to transform society by undermining existing power structures. Today, many of Alinsky’s strategies are not only alive and well—they have become standard operating procedure for progressive activists, leftist media outlets, and even mainstream Democratic leaders.
This essay explores Alinsky’s background, his ideological foundations, the content of Rules for Radicals, and how these strategies are being used today—often in the service of Neo-Marxist goals under the guise of “equity,” “justice,” or “inclusion.” Readers will be encouraged to watch today’s headlines and political rhetoric through the lens of Alinsky’s principles to better understand the tactics at play.
Saul Alinsky: Background and Ideology
Saul Alinsky (1909–1972) was a Chicago-based community organizer and social theorist. Born to Russian-Jewish immigrant parents, he earned a degree in criminology from the University of Chicago. While never formally a Communist, Alinsky admired the strategic methods of Marxist revolutionaries and advocated for radical change through the use of conflict, disruption, and psychological manipulation.
His real genius lay not in philosophy but in tactics. Alinsky was less concerned about the content of an ideology than about how to impose it on the public. He focused on using the system’s weaknesses against itself to destroy the status quo and usher in a “People’s Revolution.”
Although he distanced himself from Soviet-style totalitarianism, Alinsky embraced a worldview where ends justify the means, and moral restraint is a hindrance to revolutionary change. His most famous quote comes from the dedication in Rules for Radicals: “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical… Lucifer.”
Alinsky’s Influence on Modern Democrat Leaders
Several prominent Democrat figures have acknowledged Alinsky’s influence:
- Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis on Alinsky and corresponded with him personally.
- Barack Obama worked with organizations that operated under Alinsky’s community organizing model and was trained in related tactics while in Chicago.
- The broader progressive movement, including groups like Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and various LGBTQ+ activist networks, employ strategies that can be traced directly to Alinsky’s blueprint.
While many modern progressives may not cite him directly, his fingerprints are evident in their reliance on provocation, public shaming, and narrative manipulation.
The Rules for Radicals: Explained and Applied
Below is a breakdown of each of Alinsky’s 13 rules, translated into plain English and connected to modern “woke” or Neo-Marxist strategies:
Rule 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”
Plain meaning: Bluff. Make your opposition think you’re stronger than you are.
Modern example: Protest groups like Antifa present themselves as massive and powerful by dominating social media and partnering with sympathetic media outlets. Their real numbers may be small, but their psychological footprint is large.
Rule 2: “Never go outside the experience of your people.”
Plain meaning: Keep your tactics simple and repeatable so your followers don’t get confused or discouraged.
Modern example: Protest slogans like “Black Lives Matter” or “Trans rights are human rights” are easy to chant, emotionally loaded, and hard to oppose without social cost.
Rule 3: “Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy.”
Plain meaning: Keep your opponents off balance. Confuse or confront them with unfamiliar tactics.
Modern example: Using transgender pronouns, invented terms like “cisgender” or “intersectionality,” and redefined concepts like “equity” throws conservatives into unfamiliar moral territory and creates traps for missteps.
Rule 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
Plain meaning: Weaponize your opponent’s values and standards against them.
Modern example: Woke activists demand that Christians “love everyone” and use that to shame them into affirming sin. Similarly, they cite the Constitution’s values of “freedom” and “equality” to justify radical changes that undermine American founding principles.
Rule 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
Plain meaning: Mocking someone is often more effective than arguing with them.
Modern example: Conservative figures are routinely mocked online and in late-night comedy shows. Political satire becomes a weapon to discredit without engaging in real debate.
Rule 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
Plain meaning: Keep morale high by doing things your team thinks are fun or satisfying.
Modern example: Activists relish viral social media takedowns and “canceling” public figures. These events bond the group while humiliating opponents.
Rule 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
Plain meaning: Keep things fresh. Rotate tactics to prevent fatigue.
Modern example: Leftist causes often cycle quickly—Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, COVID lockdown protests, transgender rights—always changing the focal point but using the same pressure tactics.
Rule 8: “Keep the pressure on.”
Plain meaning: Never let up. Constant pressure leads to collapse.
Modern example: DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) offices and HR departments continually introduce new policies to keep conservatives on the defensive, with no reprieve.
Rule 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
Plain meaning: Use fear to paralyze opponents.
Modern example: Fear of being labeled “racist,” “homophobic,” or “transphobic” stops many Americans from speaking freely, even if they disagree with woke policies.
Rule 10: “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
Plain meaning: Stay organized. Don’t give the enemy time to recover.
Modern example: Progressive activists flood school boards, state legislatures, and social media with pressure campaigns to overwhelm conservative resistance.
Rule 11: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
Plain meaning: Lean into controversy. Make your liabilities look like virtues.
Modern example: Drag shows for children and gender reassignment surgeries were once unthinkable. Now they’re promoted as acts of “love” and “inclusion” in part by pushing so hard that resistance becomes labeled as bigotry.
Rule 12: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
Plain meaning: Always offer your solution after tearing something down.
Modern example: “Defund the Police” was followed by calls to replace officers with social workers. Critical Race Theory advocates tear down merit-based education, then propose equity-based grading.
Rule 13: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Plain meaning: Isolate an individual or institution, make them the villain, and go after them relentlessly.
Modern example: Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, and entire Christian schools have been targeted and smeared to set public examples and shift cultural norms.
Alinsky’s Tactics and the Woke Neo-Marxist Agenda
Neo-Marxism, especially in its intersectional form, seeks to overturn existing hierarchies and redefine morality, justice, and truth. Alinsky’s tactics are ideal for this mission:
- They manipulate public sympathy.
- They destabilize traditional institutions.
- They exploit language, fear, and shame.
Progressive activists often operate under the appearance of moral high ground while using fundamentally manipulative, destabilizing methods to silence opposition.
Real-Life Examples in the News
Look for these signs in daily headlines:
- Accusations of bigotry without evidence, designed to silence debate.
- Public shaming and social media mobs targeting anyone who speaks against the Left’s narrative.
- Strategic redefinitions of terms like “justice,” “freedom,” and “truth.”
- Pressure campaigns against businesses, churches, or schools that don’t adopt “inclusion” policies.
- Mockery of traditional values on late-night television or in public schools.
These are not random events—they are coordinated tactics straight from Alinsky’s playbook.
Conclusion: Call to Awareness
Christians and conservatives must learn to recognize the tactics being used against them. Alinsky’s methods are morally subversive and ideologically manipulative. They bypass honest dialogue and go straight to social coercion. By studying these rules and watching for them in action, readers can become better equipped to push back—not with the same weapons of mockery and fear—but with truth, courage, and steadfast commitment to biblical principles.
SDG,
Robert Sparkman
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse. Coarse language does not reflect my personal standards.
Also, I do not acknowledge that anyone transitions from male to female, and vice versa. While I might use the language of the left for purposes of communication, like the words transgender or cisgender, I do not believe their concepts. Trans men are women deluded into thinking they are men, and trans women are men deluded into thinking they are women. Trans men are not men, and trans women are not women.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.