Media Hall of Shame Series: The New Yorker

The New Yorker, despite its cultural sophistication and literary legacy, has over the past few decades evolved into one of the most predictably progressive media outlets in the United States. Founded in 1925 and owned since 1985 by Condé Nast—a media conglomerate that also owns Vogue, GQ, and Vanity Fair—The New Yorker today functions less…

Media Hall of Shame Series: Wikipedia

Wikipedia presents itself as a free, crowd-sourced online encyclopedia “that anyone can edit,” a claim that seems democratic and open-minded on the surface. However, this anonymity and openness mask an entrenched ideological ecosystem shaped not by the average contributor, but by a relatively small group of senior editors, moderators, and administrators. These gatekeepers enforce not…

Long March through the Institutions – Infiltration of Science and Medicine

Over the past half-century, activists steeped in Neo-Marxist theory have learned to wear lab coats. By re-defining words, leveraging crisis, and silencing critics, they have steered whole branches of science and medicine toward political ends. This post tells that story in plain English, offers real-world examples, and sketches a path back to honest inquiry. Neo-Marxism…

Is Wikipedia Woke? Examining Progressive Bias in the World’s Largest Online Encyclopedia

Wikipedia has become a go-to resource for quick information on nearly every conceivable topic, from historical events to scientific phenomena to biographies of public figures. Its open-editing model invites users from around the world to contribute, revise, and correct entries. In theory, this democratized structure is meant to ensure accuracy through crowdsourced accountability. But theory…