Walk into any public school today, and you may not find the words “Critical Race Theory” splashed across the curriculum. That’s deliberate. Most administrators know that parents would object. Instead, CRT—and its cousin ideologies rooted in Neo-Marxism—slip in under softer labels: “equity,” “anti-racism,” “restorative justice,” “social emotional learning.” The words sound positive, even harmless. Who could oppose fairness or kindness? But behind the euphemisms lies an agenda: to divide children into categories of oppressor and oppressed, to instill guilt in some and perpetual victimhood in others, and to train the next generation to see America’s foundations as rotten and in need of radical replacement.
Francis Schaeffer once observed that “the controlling worldview of a society will determine its character.” What we are witnessing is the smuggling in of a worldview that is neither neutral nor compassionate. It is a deliberate attempt to re-engineer how young Americans think about race, justice, gender, and truth itself.
This article pulls back the curtain. It will define the terms most often used as euphemisms for CRT in the classroom, explain how each is used as a tool of indoctrination, and then add several newer phrases now surfacing in education. Along the way, we will connect these to the broader Neo-Marxist strategy—what Rudi Dutschke called the “long march through the institutions.” Finally, we will close with a call for vigilance and practical steps for families and churches.
The Marxist Template
Critical Race Theory did not arise in a vacuum. It is an offshoot of Critical Theory, developed by the Frankfurt School in the 1930s, which applied Marxist analysis not just to economics but to culture. Traditional Marxism divided society into two groups: the bourgeoisie (oppressors) and the proletariat (oppressed). That model never took hold in America because capitalism provided rising prosperity for nearly everyone. So theorists shifted categories. Race, gender, sexuality, and religion replaced class as the new fault lines.
Thus CRT treats every institution as a “system of oppression” and every person as either oppressor or oppressed based on identity traits rather than individual character. This binary framework seeps into schools through euphemisms—words that sound therapeutic but are deeply ideological. Once understood, parents can decode the language and see what’s happening.
Let us now look at these euphemisms one by one.
The Euphemisms Decoded
Modern education often hides its ideological agenda behind pleasant-sounding words. Terms like equity, inclusion, and anti-racism seem wholesome, but many have been redefined according to Marxist and Neo-Marxist frameworks that view society as a struggle between oppressors and oppressed groups.
This list explains what those terms really mean when used in teacher-training sessions, curriculum guidelines, or school policy statements. Each entry begins with the common term as it appears in educational settings, followed by an explanation of its practical use in shaping student attitudes and classroom culture. The “How it indoctrinates” section shows how the idea is applied to influence thought and behavior, while the “Marxist” and “Neo-Marxist” origins and synonyms trace the ideological ancestry behind it.
Understanding this language will help parents, board members, and teachers recognize when a conversation about fairness or kindness has quietly shifted into political conditioning. Once you can translate the vocabulary, you can spot the worldview beneath it—and respond with clarity instead of confusion.
Anti-Racism
At first blush, this seems obvious—who isn’t against racism? But in CRT, “anti-racism” means something far more radical. Ibram X. Kendi defines it this way: “The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination.” In practice, that means any neutral policy is considered racist unless it actively redistributes resources along racial lines.
How it indoctrinates: Children are taught that neutrality is immoral. If they don’t sign on to activist causes—whether “defund the police” or racial quotas—they are complicit in racism.
Marxist Origin: Revolutionary Praxis / Class Warfare – Oppose capitalist systems through active redistribution and overthrow of class privilege.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Racial Redistribution / Antiracist Praxis – Replace “class” with “race”; activism must dismantle “white-supremacist” structures through unequal but “corrective” treatment.
Centering on (Equity/Race)
To “center” something means to make it the primary lens. If schools are “centering equity” or “centering race,” then all teaching decisions are filtered through identity politics.
How it indoctrinates: The focus is not on reading comprehension or math mastery but on how each lesson can highlight systemic oppression.
Marxist Origin: Historical Materialism – All interpretation of society through the lens of material class conflict.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Critical Theory / Identity Centrality – Interpret all knowledge and institutions through race, gender, and sexuality power dynamics.
Conscious/Unconscious Bias
The idea that everyone holds prejudices, whether they are aware of them or not.
How it indoctrinates: Students are told they can never fully escape bias, especially if they are white. Training sessions reinforce constant self-doubt.
Marxist Origin: False Consciousness – Workers unknowingly perpetuate capitalist ideology.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Internalized Oppression / Implicit Ideology – Individuals unconsciously sustain racial or gender hierarchies even while denying them.
Critical Self-Reflection
This means analyzing your own privilege, biases, and complicity. Assignments often involve journals, essays, or class discussions.
How it indoctrinates: Students are pressured to confess “privilege.” It functions like a secular version of confession and penance, except guilt is never lifted.
Marxist Origin: Self-Criticism (Critika i Samokritika) – Party members publicly confess ideological errors to realign with revolutionary orthodoxy.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Privilege Confession / Ideological Deconstruction – Individuals interrogate their own complicity in oppression; guilt never erased.
Critical Thinking/Critical Pedagogy/Critical Awareness
The belief that students must be awakened to the power structures that supposedly shape every aspect of life—race, class, gender, religion, and sexuality. Neutrality or content mastery are viewed as barriers to “liberation.” Borrowed from Marxist and Neo-Marxist education theorists such as Paulo Freire, it teaches that awareness without activism is immoral.
How it indoctrinates: Classrooms shift from teaching knowledge to teaching grievance. Students learn to see themselves primarily as members of oppressed or oppressor groups, and moral virtue is measured by activism. Teachers become facilitators of political consciousness rather than instructors of objective truth.
Marxist Origin: Class Consciousness – The worker’s awakening to his exploitation under capitalism, leading to solidarity and revolution.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Critical Consciousness / Woke Awareness / Praxis Education – Identity-based enlightenment replacing class struggle; “awakened” students act as change agents to dismantle perceived systemic oppression.
Cultural Relevance
This term means tailoring education to the student’s cultural background. On the surface, it seems reasonable. But in practice, it often means replacing traditional Western literature, history, and civics with activist-approved material.
How it indoctrinates: Shakespeare is dismissed as “white, male, and colonial,” while activist writings are elevated. Students are taught to interpret all knowledge through the lens of identity politics.
Marxist Origin: Proletarian Culture (Proletkult) – Create art and education for the working class; abolish “bourgeois” standards.
Neo-Marxist Equivalent: Identity-Based Pedagogy – Replace “Eurocentric” curricula with materials valorizing marginalized identities.
Culturally Responsive
Closely related, this approach affirms students’ identities by embedding progressive views of race and gender in all subjects—even math or science.
How it indoctrinates: A math problem isn’t just about numbers; it becomes a lesson on “racial wealth gaps.” Science class brings in discussions of “climate justice.” Academics are bent into activism.
Marxist Origin: Political Re-education – All institutions must serve revolutionary consciousness.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Cultural Reconstruction – Every classroom becomes a site for progressive social engineering on gender, race, and sexuality.
Equity, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI/DEI)
“Diversity” and “inclusion” sound positive, but the keyword is “equity.” Unlike equality of opportunity, equity demands equality of outcomes. If outcomes differ between groups, the system is considered racist and must be manipulated to enforce balance.
How it indoctrinates: Hiring, admissions, and even grading standards are skewed. Students learn that group identity outweighs merit. Excellence is sacrificed on the altar of ideological conformity.
Marxist Origin: Economic Egalitarianism / Redistribution of Wealth – Equalize outcomes by state intervention.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Equity of Identity / Redistribution of Status – Equalize social power among identity groups via quotas and preferential policies.
Identity Deconstruction
This is the deliberate dismantling of traditional identity categories—male/female, husband/wife, even American citizen.
How it indoctrinates: Children are encouraged to “find their authentic self,” often meaning to question their biological sex or religious upbringing. It destabilizes identity and primes students for gender ideology.
Marxist Origin: Abolition of the Family and Bourgeois Morality – Break down traditional roles that sustain private property and hierarchy.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Deconstruction of Essential Identities – Dissolve gender, national, and religious identities to destabilize Western norms.
Implicit/Explicit Bias
Explicit bias is obvious prejudice; implicit bias is hidden and unconscious.
How it indoctrinates: Even without evidence of prejudice, accusations are sustained. Students are made to assume guilt based on skin color.
Marxist Origin: Ideological Contamination – Even well-intentioned workers replicate capitalist ideas.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Structural Racism Internalization – Prejudice and dominance embedded deep within cultural consciousness.
Internalized Racial Superiority
The claim that white people subconsciously believe they are better.
How it indoctrinates: Encourages perpetual guilt. No matter how kindly one behaves, whiteness itself is framed as infected with superiority.
Marxist Origin: Bourgeois Class Consciousness – The ruling class believes its dominance is natural and virtuous.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Whiteness as Cultural Hegemony – Dominant racial identity viewed as invisible yet oppressive norm.
Intersectionality
Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, intersectionality teaches that oppression compounds when identities overlap—say, a black lesbian woman.
How it indoctrinates: Classrooms begin ranking students by a hierarchy of victimhood. “Lived experience” is elevated over facts. A white Christian boy’s opinion is considered less valid than a minority female’s, regardless of content.
Marxist Origin: Solidarity of the Proletariat – Workers unite across borders to confront capitalism.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Coalition of the Oppressed – Race, gender, sexuality, and class intersect as collective revolutionary identities.
Marginalized/Minoritized/Underrepresented Communities
Labels used to describe groups seen as oppressed.
How it indoctrinates: Children are trained to assign moral worth based on group identity rather than character or achievement. Victimhood becomes a currency.
Marxist Origin: Proletariat – The exploited working class.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Subaltern / Oppressed Identities – Minorities, women, and sexual minorities recast as revolutionary agents.
Multi-Culturalism
This term suggests celebrating all cultures equally. In reality, it often means vilifying Western civilization while uncritically elevating other cultures.
How it indoctrinates: Students are told that America’s heritage is defined by slavery and colonization, while ignoring the virtues of free government, liberty of conscience, or Judeo-Christian morality.
Marxist Origin: Internationalism – Reject national loyalty; promote global class solidarity.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Post-National Pluralism – Dismantle Western cultural dominance through relativism and identity celebration.
Normativity
This refers to “heteronormativity” or “Christian normativity”—the idea that traditional family and faith create harmful social expectations.
How it indoctrinates: Marriage, family, and biblical morality are portrayed as oppressive structures to be dismantled.
Marxist Origin: Bourgeois Morality / Religious Superstructure – Traditional values as instruments of control.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Heteronormativity / Cisnormativity / Christian Normativity – Traditional moral frameworks are pathologized as oppression.
Oppressor vs. Oppressed
Here, the Marxist template is most visible. Students are divided into groups: white, male, Christian = oppressor; minority, female, LGBTQ+ = oppressed.
How it indoctrinates: Kids are taught that their moral worth is not based on character but on group identity. It fosters resentment in the “oppressed” and guilt in the “oppressors.”
Marxist Origin: Bourgeois vs. Proletariat – Economic exploiters versus the exploited.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Dominant Identities vs. Marginalized Identities – White, male, Christian, cisgender versus minority categories.
Reflective Exercises
Assignments that ask students to reflect on privilege, oppression, or bias.
How it indoctrinates: Grading becomes tied to ideological agreement. A student who resists parroting the party line risks lower grades.
Marxist Origin: Political Indoctrination / Party Line Testing – Demonstrate loyalty through ideological analysis.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Privilege Reflection / Bias Journaling – Grade compliance to progressive dogma.
Racial Justice
Closely tied to social justice, racial justice means correcting disparities through intentional favoritism.
How it indoctrinates: Promotes reparations, quotas, and preferential policies in hiring and schooling. Children are primed to accept collective guilt and collective reward.
Marxist Origin: Revolutionary Justice / Corrective Redistribution – Expropriation of bourgeois assets to right historical wrongs.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Reparative Justice / Identity-Based Equity – Preferential treatment justified by group-level guilt or victimhood.
Restorative Justice
Originally a criminal justice idea, restorative justice in schools replaces discipline with “dialogue” and “healing circles.”
How it indoctrinates: Misbehavior goes unpunished under the banner of equity. Students learn that consequences are oppressive, especially if disciplinary statistics show racial disparities.
Marxist Origin: Rehabilitation through Ideological Reform – Re-educate rather than punish, to produce the “new man.”
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Therapeutic Justice – Replace discipline with emotional dialogue; punishment is seen as oppressive.
Restorative Practices
Beyond discipline, this idea extends to classroom culture. Students form circles, share grievances, and practice “healing dialogues.”
How it indoctrinates: Authority is undermined. Teachers become facilitators of activism rather than instructors of knowledge.
Marxist Origin: Collective Self-Criticism Sessions – Public confession and mutual correction.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Healing Circles / Dialogue Pedagogy – Institutionalized emotional activism and group guilt rituals.
Social Emotional Learning (SEL)
Marketed as teaching empathy, resilience, and teamwork, SEL has morphed into a delivery system for progressive values.
How it indoctrinates: Under SEL, students are encouraged to “explore identity,” discuss systemic injustice, and adopt political stances—all framed as “emotional health.” Parents rarely realize how politicized SEL has become.
Marxist Origin: Emotional Conditioning for Class Solidarity – Cultivate loyalty to the revolutionary collective.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Affective Indoctrination – Shape emotions around empathy for the “oppressed” and hostility toward “systems.”
Social Justice
This phrase is perhaps the broadest umbrella term. Justice, biblically understood, means impartiality under God’s law. Social justice, however, means redistributing power and resources to favor groups labeled as oppressed.
How it indoctrinates: Children are taught that fairness requires activism. They are encouraged to become “change agents” in line with progressive political causes.
Marxist Origin: Economic Justice / Redistribution of Means of Production – Restructure society to eliminate class differences.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Cultural Justice / Redistribution of Power and Voice – Shift moral and social capital to “marginalized” identities.
Systemic Racism
Rather than focusing on individual prejudice, “systemic racism” insists that every American institution is designed to favor whites and harm minorities. Whether or not any individual behaves with bias is irrelevant—the system is guilty.
How it indoctrinates: Students are led to distrust America’s history and institutions, regarding them as hopelessly corrupt. Respect for the Constitution, rule of law, or free markets is replaced with suspicion.
Marxist Origin: Structural Exploitation / Economic Superstructure – The capitalist system is inherently oppressive.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Structural Oppression of Identity Groups – Western civilization itself built to preserve racial hierarchy.
Systems of Power/Oppression
This is the overarching worldview: all institutions are arranged to benefit the powerful (oppressors) at the expense of the powerless (oppressed).
How it indoctrinates: Free markets, the justice system, and even the church are delegitimized. Students are encouraged to tear down rather than reform.
Marxist Origin: Superstructure of Capitalism – Law, religion, culture serve the ruling class.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Cultural Hegemony (Gramsci) – Dominant norms perpetuate oppression through consent and socialization.
White Fragility
Robin DiAngelo’s concept is that if a white person denies racism, that denial proves their racism.
How it indoctrinates: This is a classic silencing tactic. Any disagreement is proof of guilt. The debate is shut down before it begins.
Marxist Origin: Counter-Revolutionary Consciousness – Resistance to party line reveals loyalty to bourgeois interests.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Defensive Whiteness / Epistemic Closure – Denial of guilt confirms participation in the oppressive system.
White Privilege
The claim that all white people benefit from unearned advantages.
How it indoctrinates: White students are taught to view themselves with suspicion and guilt. Minority students are taught to assume failure is always due to external oppression.
Marxist Origin: Class Privilege – Unmerited advantage derived from ownership or status.
Neo-Marxist Synonyms: Racialized Privilege / Invisible Power – Whiteness grants systemic advantage; “allyship” requires continual penance.
New Euphemisms Entering the Classroom
The language keeps evolving. Even as parents catch on to one term, schools invent another. Here are several emerging euphemisms to watch:
- Belonging – A softer DEI term meaning ideological conformity.
- Global Citizenship – Encourages children to see themselves as part of the world before their own nation.
- Civic Engagement – Framed as community involvement, but usually means leftist activism.
- Equitable Grading – Adjusting standards to prevent “disparate outcomes,” which means lowering rigor.
- Gender-Inclusive Language – Replacing “mother” and “father” with “birthing parent” and “caregiver.”
- Trauma-Informed Teaching – Sounds compassionate, but often becomes a wedge to inject race and gender ideology.
- Decolonizing the Curriculum – Removing Western heritage and replacing it with activist texts.
- Transformative Education – Code for using education as activism to transform society.
- Critical Media Literacy – Ostensibly teaching kids to spot bias, but only conservative sources are flagged.
- Lived Experience – Personal stories elevated above data or reason, weaponized to shut down debate.
Biblical and Historical Analysis
The Christian faith insists that truth is not defined by group identity but by God’s Word. The biblical standard is impartiality: “You shall do no injustice in judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor, nor defer to the great, but you are to judge your neighbor fairly” (Leviticus 19:15). CRT undermines this by insisting on perpetual partiality.
Church history provides a warning. J. Gresham Machen, fighting liberalism in the early 20th century, argued that false teaching thrives when cloaked in familiar terms. “It is often said that what we nowadays call liberalism is only the old gospel restated in terms of the modern mind. But…what the liberal theologian has retained after abandoning to the enemy one Christian doctrine after another is not Christianity at all, but a religion which is so entirely different from Christianity as to belong in a distinct category.” Substitute “education” for “gospel,” and the point stands.
The Long March Through the Institutions
The German Marxist Rudi Dutschke coined the phrase “the long march through the institutions” to describe how radicals could transform society without a violent revolution. Instead of storming the gates, they would infiltrate schools, universities, media, and churches, gradually reshaping culture from within.
That is precisely what has happened in American education. From universities that trained teachers, to state boards of education, to textbook companies, the worldview of Critical Theory has trickled downward until it saturates even the youngest classrooms. Children in elementary school now hear lessons about “social justice” and “identity.” Middle schoolers learn about “equity” and “systemic racism.” High schoolers are pressed into activism.
Parents object, and schools respond: “We’re not teaching Critical Race Theory. That’s just law school material.” Technically, they may not be teaching Derrick Bell’s legal essays. But the framework—the categories of oppressor/oppressed, systemic guilt, and redistribution—is smuggled in under the euphemisms. The long march is largely complete.
Real-Life Examples
- Restorative Justice in Discipline: In Minneapolis, school discipline was revamped to avoid “disparate impact.” Suspensions dropped, but classrooms grew chaotic, disproportionately harming the very minority students discipline reforms claimed to help.
- Equitable Grading: In California districts, grading policies have been changed so that homework, deadlines, and participation no longer “unfairly penalize” certain groups. Excellence is discouraged; mediocrity is rewarded.
- Social Emotional Learning: In Illinois, state SEL standards require schools to integrate “equity” and “diversity” goals into mental health lessons. Emotional training becomes political training.
- Decolonizing the Curriculum: New York schools have promoted curricula that minimize Western literature and instead highlight “counter-narratives.” The result is that students graduate knowing activist slogans but not Shakespeare, Locke, or Lincoln.
These examples confirm that euphemisms are not harmless language games. They are policy drivers that reshape schools and shape children.
Why This Matters
Education is never neutral. Every classroom forms character, teaches values, and passes on a vision of the good life. Historically, American education—though imperfect—passed on a love of liberty, the value of hard work, and respect for the nation’s biblical and constitutional heritage.
The new euphemistic language seeks to overturn that inheritance. Children are taught to see themselves primarily as racial or gendered beings, not as individuals created in the image of God. They are told that America’s story is one of oppression, not liberty. They are told that truth is relative, not objective.
Thomas Sowell once observed: “The most basic question is not what is best, but who shall decide what is best.” Under euphemistic CRT, the decision is made not by parents or communities but by ideological bureaucrats.
Biblical Response
Scripture cuts across the categories of CRT. The Bible teaches that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). No race or gender is inherently guilty or innocent. Redemption comes through Christ, not through perpetual confession of privilege.
The gospel brings true reconciliation: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). This does not erase our differences but unites us under a higher identity.
Christians must therefore resist false gospels of identity politics. Like Machen resisting liberalism, or Bonhoeffer resisting Nazism, believers must expose euphemisms for what they are and insist upon truth.
How Parents and Churches Can Respond
- Decode the Language. Know that “equity” is not equality, “justice” is not impartiality, and “restorative” is not truly restorative.
- Demand Transparency. Ask to see the curricula. Don’t accept vague reassurances.
- Engage School Boards. Many policies are set locally. Show up, speak up, and run for office if needed.
- Support Alternatives. Christian schools, homeschools, and co-ops offer havens of sanity.
- Train Your Children. Parents are the primary educators. Teach biblical truth at home so children recognize counterfeits.
- Pray and Persevere. This is spiritual warfare as much as cultural conflict.
Conclusion
CRT does not enter schools through the front door labeled “Critical Race Theory.” It sneaks in through the side doors of “equity,” “inclusion,” and “social emotional learning.” The words sound comforting, but the ideas corrode. If left unchallenged, they will raise a generation more loyal to grievance than gratitude, more committed to activism than excellence, and more certain of oppression than of liberty.
The good news is that the truth is stronger than lies. Parents who understand the language, churches that speak with clarity, and citizens who refuse to be intimidated can resist. The euphemisms lose power when exposed to light. As Christ said, “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32).
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
MMXXV
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
I use words that reflect the “woke” culture and their re-definitions sometimes. It is hard to communicate effectively without using their twisted vocabulary. Rest assured that I do not believe gender ideology or “Progressivism”. Words and phrases like “trans man”, “trans women” , “transgender”, “transition” or similar words and phrases are nonsensical and reflect a distorted, imaginary worldview where men can become women and vice-versa. The word “Progressive” itself is a propagandistic word that implies the Progressives are the positive force in society, whereas in reality their cultic belief system is very corrosive to mankind.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.