In an age that boasts of tolerance, enlightenment, and progress, we are witnessing a growing number of people who appear enslaved—not by visible chains, but by their ideas. They speak in slogans, think in hashtags, and react to dissent not with reason but rage. These individuals exhibit a kind of mental and moral captivity that has been rightly labeled ideological possession. It’s a condition not of mental illness, but of spiritual and intellectual bondage, whereby the person becomes so consumed by an ideology that it overrides critical thinking, moral discernment, and even natural affections.
This post will define ideological possession, describe its characteristics, explore its manifestations in Neo-Marxist and gender ideology movements, highlight real-world consequences including violence and murder, and finally, evaluate this phenomenon through the lens of biblical Christianity and sound philosophy.
What Is Ideological Possession?
Ideological possession occurs when an individual so completely absorbs an ideology that it dictates their every thought, feeling, and response. In essence, the ideology “thinks” for them. Like a parasite of the mind, it supplies pre-fabricated answers, rewires moral instincts, and suppresses nuance. The ideologically possessed individual often loses the ability to dialogue meaningfully, to empathize across ideological lines, or to question their own assumptions.
It is not the same as merely holding strong convictions. A person may be passionate about a cause, yet still remain self-reflective, charitable, and open to correction. Ideological possession, however, is marked by intellectual rigidity and emotional hostility.
Core Characteristics of Ideological Possession
- Dogmatism – The ideology is held with religious zeal. Doubt is sin. Heresy is treason.
- Binary Moralism – The world is divided into pure allies and evil enemies. There is no gray area, no room for nuance.
- Thought-Terminating Clichés – Slogans like “love is love,” “my truth,” “silence is violence,” or “trust the science” replace reasoned discourse.
- Emotional Reactivity – Disagreement is perceived as personal violence. Emotional outrage substitutes for argument.
- Tribalism – The group identity becomes more important than truth or personal integrity.
- Dehumanization of Dissent – Opponents are not just wrong—they are bigots, fascists, Nazis, or worse. They must be silenced.
- Inversion of Virtue – Vices such as wrath, envy, or sexual perversion are rebranded as moral courage or authenticity.
- Self-Justification by Victimhood – Moral authority is claimed through a hierarchy of perceived oppression.
- Suppression of Natural Affection – Even family and friends are disposable if they fail the ideological purity test.
This kind of intellectual and moral captivity is not new. The Pharisees of Jesus’ day were ideologically possessed by a religious legalism that blinded them to mercy, truth, and the incarnate Son of God. Today, the same phenomenon occurs in different garb.
Ideological Possession in Neo-Marxism and Gender Ideology
Ideological possession is most clearly seen today in the Neo-Marxist and gender ideology movements. These are modern manifestations of the ancient rebellion of man seeking to redefine truth, morality, and even reality apart from God.
Neo-Marxism
Neo-Marxism extends the economic class struggle of Karl Marx into a broader cultural and identity-based revolution. It divides the world into oppressor and oppressed categories across race, gender, sexuality, religion, and more.
In this view:
- Whites oppress blacks
- Men oppress women
- Christians oppress atheists or Muslims
- Straight people oppress the LGBTQ+ community
Justice is redefined as dismantling these systems of “oppression” through equity mandates, censorship, and even violence. Individual guilt or innocence is irrelevant; only group identity matters.
Those possessed by this ideology are often seen shouting down speakers, vandalizing property, or canceling dissenters—not because they are thinkers, but because they are soldiers in a war against the created order.
Gender Ideology
Gender ideology teaches that sex is assigned at birth and that gender is a fluid, self-defined construct. It encourages children to question their biology, undermines parental authority, and insists that society must validate all self-identities—even when they defy logic or biology.
This ideology leads its adherents to:
- Reject basic facts of human anatomy
- View disagreement as literal violence
- Promote hormonal and surgical interventions on minors
- Cheer when parents lose custody for refusing to affirm gender delusion
Gender ideologues often dehumanize Christians and conservatives who hold to biblical norms of male and female. Like Neo-Marxists, they regard dissent not merely as incorrect, but as morally monstrous.
Real-World Consequences: When Ideology Kills
Ideological possession does not always remain in the realm of bad ideas. Sometimes it fuels murder and mass violence. Here are several tragic examples that appear to bear the marks of ideological possession:
1. Murder of Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky in Washington, D.C. (May 2025)
On May 21, 2025, Sarah Milgrim, 26, and Yaron Lischinsky, 30—both employees of the Israeli Embassy—were gunned down in Washington, D.C., outside the Capital Jewish Museum after attending a young diplomats’ event. The suspected murderer, Elias Rodriguez, 31, reportedly shouted “Free, free Palestine!” upon arrest and is being investigated for antisemitic hate crimes. Lischinsky had planned to propose to Milgrim during an upcoming trip to Israel. This was not random violence; it appears ideologically motivated—a chilling reminder of how propaganda and hate-driven worldviews can drive individuals to murder innocent people, dehumanized by their perceived identity.
2. Transgender Shooter at Covenant School in Nashville (2023)
A woman identifying as a trans man, Audrey Hale, murdered three Christian children and three adults at a Christian school. Her writings, later revealed, were filled with hatred for “white privilege,” Christianity, and traditional norms. This was not random; it was a targeted act by someone radicalized by gender and identity-based grievance narratives.
3. James Hodgkinson – Congressional Baseball Shooting (2017)
Hodgkinson, a Bernie Sanders supporter and progressive activist, opened fire on Republican lawmakers at a practice game, nearly killing Rep. Steve Scalise. His social media was saturated with anti-Republican, pro-Marxist content. He had come to view political opponents as enemies of humanity.
4. Antifa and BLM-Related Violence (2020)
In the aftermath of George Floyd’s death, cities burned, people were killed, and untold millions were in damages. Rioters were not merely angry; they were possessed by revolutionary narratives—believing that violence was morally justified against “white supremacy,” “capitalism,” and “fascism” (which, in their minds, included suburban families and small business owners).
A Christian and Philosophical Analysis
From a Christian perspective, ideological possession can be understood through the framework of the three great enemies of the soul:
- The Flesh (Our Fallen Nature)
Our sinful nature loves lies that justify rebellion and self-will. As Jeremiah 17:9 reminds us, “The heart is deceitful above all things.” Ideologies that reject God’s design for family, authority, and truth find fertile ground in the fallen human heart. - The World (Corrupt Systems and Cultures)
Ideologies do not flourish in a vacuum. They are promoted by media, academia, corporations, and politicians. Romans 12:2 warns Christians not to be conformed to this world, and 1 John 2:15–17 warns against loving the world’s system, which is passing away. - Spiritual Forces of Darkness
Though this post avoids a direct discussion of demonic possession, Scripture is clear that dark spiritual forces are active in the promotion of lies, chaos, and hatred (Ephesians 6:12). Ideological possession blinds minds (2 Corinthians 4:4), hardens hearts, and sets up false gods in the soul.
Philosophical Consideration
From the Philosopher’s lens, especially through thinkers like Socrates, C.S. Lewis, and Thomas Sowell, we observe that ideological possession substitutes dogma for dialectic, emotion for reason, and tribe for truth. The possessed individual is not a seeker of truth but a repeater of orthodoxy defined by the crowd.
C.S. Lewis warned in The Abolition of Man that modern ideologies often create “men without chests”—creatures of appetite and slogans who cannot reason morally. Likewise, Thomas Sowell has written extensively on the “unconstrained vision,” which refuses to accept human limitations, moral absolutes, or divine order.
The end result is not liberation—but mental slavery and social decay.
A Christian Response to Ideological Possession
Christians must respond not with fear or hatred, but with clarity, courage, and compassion. We must:
- Proclaim truth boldly: Refuse to affirm lies about gender, justice, or morality.
- Train minds and hearts: Equip believers to reason from Scripture and stand against cultural pressure.
- Resist indoctrination: Guard our families and churches from the infiltration of worldly ideologies.
- Love our enemies: Remember that those possessed by ideology are not beyond redemption. Paul was once a violent zealot—but God saved him.
Conclusion: Freedom Is in the Truth
Ideological possession is real—and it is deadly. It replaces the image of God in man with the image of the revolution. It substitutes the gospel of grace with a gospel of grievance. It claims to liberate, but it enslaves.
Yet Christ offers true liberty: “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:31–32).
Let us walk in that truth, resist the spirit of the age, and help rescue those still trapped in its grip.
Robert Sparkman
RELATED CONTENT
Chuck Holton is the content creator of Hot Zone with Chuck Holton. He is an independent reporter from an Army Ranger background. He discusses ideological possession in this video. I highly recommend his content.
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse and do not reflect my personal standards, particularly in regards to leftist protesters and rioters.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at [email protected] if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.