Bloomberg News is often presented as the grown-up in the room: sober, data-driven, and immune to the hysterics of legacy broadcast networks. Its target audience isn’t the average voter—it’s the policymaker, the hedge fund manager, the international bureaucrat. With its vast network of reporters and global presence, Bloomberg offers financial news, economic forecasts, and business analysis at the highest level.
But scratch beneath the surface of its professionalism and “neutral tone,” and you’ll find a deeply ideological worldview. Bloomberg doesn’t shout like Rolling Stone or scold like The New York Times, but it pushes the same moral framework: globalist, progressive, and contemptuous of tradition. It cloaks opinion in expertise, ideology in data, and leftist dogma in “consensus.”
This article will examine Bloomberg’s ownership, tone, ideological tilt, scandals, and how it handles twenty defining issues that separate Progressive and Conservative worldviews. The result? Bloomberg is no neutral reporter—it’s a polished evangelist for global progressive governance.
Ownership and Worldview
Founded in 1990 by Michael R. Bloomberg, the company is privately held and remains under the control of the billionaire media mogul. Michael Bloomberg is no political neutral:
- Former Mayor of New York City (elected as a Republican, governed as a technocrat, ran for President as a Democrat)
- Advocate of gun control, climate change action, abortion rights, and urban globalism
- Founder and funder of Everytown for Gun Safety, the largest gun control group in America
- Mega-donor to the Democratic Party, especially in 2020 to defeat Donald Trump
Bloomberg the man shapes Bloomberg the media. Despite the company’s code of “editorial independence,” it is unthinkable that its reporting would challenge the very causes its owner funds and promotes.
Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg News
Bloomberg News is the journalistic arm of Bloomberg LP, a financial software and data company used globally by banks, hedge funds, and governments. While it serves financial elites, the editorial side reflects the political consensus of its core clientele: cosmopolitan, urban, socially liberal, and technocratically inclined.
Though it tries to avoid overt partisanship, Bloomberg’s institutional worldview is that of the global managerial class. It assumes that:
- Climate change requires government-coordinated global economic restructuring
- “Disinformation” must be suppressed for democracy to function
- DEI is essential for justice
- National borders are outdated
- Christianity is fine if privatized, but dangerous if public
Typical Claims and Outlook
Tone: Cool, Professional, Progressive
Bloomberg is never shrill. It speaks with charts, data visualizations, and expert interviews. But that’s precisely what makes it effective. Its ideology is embedded, not shouted:
- A graph showing “racial disparities” assumes systemic racism
- An ESG analysis assumes carbon neutrality as moral imperative
- A feature on gender identity presumes biology is bigotry
This “expert framing” means readers are rarely confronted with the fact that they’re being steered into progressive assumptions.
General Perspective
Across beats—climate, energy, education, race, healthcare—Bloomberg prioritizes:
- Global over local
- Equity over equality
- State coordination over individual freedom
- Elite consensus over dissenting populism
- Institutional science over critical skepticism
- Technocracy over constitutionalism
Specific Incidents of Bias
Suppression of Michael Bloomberg Criticism During 2020 Campaign
When Michael Bloomberg entered the Democratic primary in 2020, Bloomberg News announced it would not investigate its owner or his rivals. Instead, it declared it would “extend the same policy to other Democratic candidates” and only investigate President Trump. This revealed the farce of neutrality: protecting Democrats, especially Bloomberg himself, while going after Republicans.
Climate Coverage as Ideological Crusade
Bloomberg’s climate desk routinely publishes stories as if the science is entirely settled and only political will is lacking. It rarely quotes climate realists or dissenting scientists. In one 2023 article, it described fossil fuel expansion as a “crime against the planet” and urged litigation against oil companies. Such language has become common at Bloomberg, with “climate justice” and “net zero” being treated as gospel.
Gender and Pronoun Activism in Style Guides
In internal memos and external reporting, Bloomberg now requires reporters to use preferred pronouns and affirm “gender identity” regardless of biological sex. In a 2022 article on school policies, it described parental objections to trans ideology as “misinformation.” Critics were labeled “anti-trans extremists,” not concerned parents or constitutional advocates.
Neo-Marxist and Ideological Influence
Language and Framing
Bloomberg adopts much of the vocabulary of the Neo-Marxist left:
- “Systemic inequality”
- “Environmental racism”
- “Misinformation” (used to dismiss dissent)
- “Equity” (as policy goal)
- “Decolonize” (especially in education and urban policy)
Articles often cite think tanks or academics associated with critical race theory, radical gender theory, and ESG activism.
Hostility to Traditional Institutions
While rarely direct, Bloomberg subtly undermines Christian moral teaching and constitutional conservatism:
- Frames religious liberty claims as a threat to LGBTQ+ rights
- Supports government intervention in homeschooling and parental rights
- Questions the legitimacy of originalist interpretations of the Constitution
Collaboration with Progressive Institutions
Bloomberg journalists frequently partner with globalist and left-wing organizations:
- World Economic Forum
- United Nations Development Programme
- Rockefeller Foundation
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
These relationships reinforce a worldview in which global technocracy is moral authority—and dissenters are treated as backward or dangerous.
Most Ideologically Reflective Figures
A. John Micklethwait – Editor-in-Chief
Micklethwait, who also previously served as editor of The Economist, embodies Bloomberg’s tone: polished, British, and globalist. Under his leadership, Bloomberg has prioritized climate coverage, diversity hiring, and COVID-19 consensus science, while avoiding conservative or populist framing. Though not a culture warrior, his editorial direction reinforces soft progressivism masked as expertise.
B. Mark Gongloff – Opinion Editor
Gongloff’s editorial judgment reflects elite progressive biases. Under his watch, the opinion section routinely publishes pieces defending ESG, gender ideology, COVID mandates, and DEI, while warning about “disinformation” and the “threat of right-wing populism.” His tone is urbane but derisive toward traditionalist views.
C. Akshat Rathi – Senior Climate Reporter
Rathi is a leading voice on Bloomberg’s climate desk, and his work pushes beyond journalism into activism. He has argued for ending fossil fuel subsidies, praised climate lawsuits against oil firms, and criticized moderates as insufficiently urgent. He frequently collaborates with climate policy NGOs and idealizes supranational intervention over national energy sovereignty.
D. Lisa Abramowicz – Anchor and Contributor
On Bloomberg Television and radio, Abramowicz frequently reinforces socially liberal and globalist economic talking points. Her reporting on issues like abortion, ESG, and January 6 reflects the editorial slant: downplaying legitimate conservative views while echoing institutional narratives.
Scandals and Controversies
2020 Presidential Campaign Conflict of Interest
When Michael Bloomberg launched his 2020 presidential bid, Bloomberg News declared that it would not investigate him or his Democratic rivals—but would continue investigating Donald Trump. The double standard was glaring. Reporters within the organization expressed discomfort, and the editorial independence of the outlet was widely criticized. The message was clear: progressive partisanship overrides journalistic integrity.
Suppression of Pro-Life Voices
Bloomberg’s reporting on abortion is among the most one-sided in the financial press. In coverage of the Dobbs decision, Bloomberg ran multiple pieces warning of economic collapse, corporate backlash, and women’s suffering. It failed to quote a single pro-life legal scholar or acknowledge fetal personhood as a serious legal issue. Even financial reporting on abortion-related lawsuits was slanted toward the abortion industry.
COVID-19 Narrative Enforcement
During the pandemic, Bloomberg amplified state-corporate messaging without meaningful skepticism. It supported lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and digital tracking. Articles that questioned mask efficacy, natural immunity, or early treatment alternatives were framed as fringe. Coverage of dissenting scientists like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya or the Great Barrington Declaration was negative or absent.
ESG Promotion Without Disclosure
Bloomberg heavily promotes ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) frameworks, especially in its business tools and analytics. Yet it often fails to disclose that Bloomberg terminals and analytics profit from ESG scoring models. Its financial interest in ESG is rarely mentioned in its ESG advocacy articles—a serious breach of transparency.
Bloomberg on 20 Progressive vs. Conservative Issues
Let’s evaluate Bloomberg News on the same 20 ideological markers used throughout this Hall of Shame series:
1. Election Integrity and Voter Laws
Bloomberg frames GOP-backed voting laws as “restrictions” or “barriers,” and frequently quotes progressive election activists. It avoids discussing election security risks, often calling them “baseless claims.”
2. Abortion and Reproductive Rights
It treats abortion as a healthcare right and economic necessity. Coverage favors Planned Parenthood, demonizes pro-life organizations, and uses terms like “forced birth” for pro-life policies.
3. Gender Identity and Transgender Policies
It affirms gender ideology in all coverage. It supports medical transition for minors, condemns bans on puberty blockers, and refers to parental oversight as “anti-trans laws.” It uses preferred pronouns and avoids scientific critiques of gender identity claims.
4. Race and Systemic Racism
Bloomberg treats systemic racism as a given, promoting race-based hiring, equity policies, and DEI practices. Its coverage of policing, housing, and wealth gaps is shaped by critical race theory assumptions.
5. Climate Change and Energy Policy
The outlet pushes the most aggressive climate narratives—net zero, carbon taxes, ESG mandates. It demonizes fossil fuels, downplays nuclear energy, and rarely features climate skeptics or energy realists.
6. Immigration and Border Security
Bloomberg supports lenient immigration policies, DACA expansion, and amnesty. It emphasizes immigrant success stories while downplaying border crimes or economic costs of illegal immigration.
7. Israel and the Middle East Conflict
While less inflammatory than Al Jazeera, Bloomberg often frames Israel as an aggressor and emphasizes Palestinian grievances. It uses “occupation” language and seldom covers antisemitism in Arab media or Hamas brutality.
8. Second Amendment and Gun Control
Given Michael Bloomberg’s role in Everytown for Gun Safety, the outlet is predictably anti-gun. It promotes bans on so-called “assault weapons,” red flag laws, and extensive regulation. It rarely discusses defensive gun use or the Second Amendment’s philosophical foundations.
9. LGBTQ+ Rights and Religious Liberty
Bloomberg supports LGBTQ+ rights over religious liberty. It frames Christian conscience claims as discriminatory and affirms progressive interpretations of marriage, gender, and public accommodations.
10. COVID-19 Policy and Mandates
It supported lockdowns, school closures, vaccine passports, and censorship. It painted dissenters as dangerous and favored centralized pandemic control.
11. Policing and Criminal Justice
It emphasizes systemic racism in policing and promotes “reform” initiatives like restorative justice and reduced sentencing. It rarely highlights victims of violent crime or the collapse of public safety in progressive-run cities.
12. Education and Parental Rights
It supports teacher authority, opposes parental review of curricula, and supports CRT and gender ideology in schools. It frames school board challengers as radical or conspiratorial.
13. Censorship and Big Tech
It supports platform content moderation to fight “misinformation.” It rarely criticizes the Twitter Files, social media-government collusion, or viewpoint suppression.
14. January 6 and Political Violence
It portrays January 6 as an existential threat to democracy and compares it to 9/11. It downplays BLM riots or progressive violence and avoids discussing the political weaponization of prosecutions.
15. Corporate Wokeness and ESG
Bloomberg is one of ESG’s biggest boosters. It treats corporate DEI efforts as essential and supports political alignment in business decisions. It criticizes companies that resist ideological conformity.
16. Hunter Biden, Biden Family, and Political Corruption
It downplayed the Hunter Biden laptop story and repeated the “Russian disinformation” narrative early on. It avoided in-depth reporting on Biden family influence peddling until after the 2020 election.
17. Trump and the Republican Party
It frames Trump as an authoritarian threat, regularly associates him with fascism, and treats MAGA voters as irrational. The GOP is portrayed as regressive and dangerous to democracy.
18. Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences
Bloomberg supported affirmative action and criticized the Supreme Court’s decision to strike it down. It frames merit-based admissions as racially insensitive and unfair to minorities.
19. International Institutions and Sovereignty
It supports the UN, WHO, IMF, and WEF. It favors global treaties and transnational cooperation over national sovereignty. Nationalism is treated as dangerous or backward.
20. Culture War Issues
It supports drag queen story hours, gender-neutral language, and expansive definitions of hate speech. It frames traditional morality as outdated and exclusionary.
Final Evaluation and Conclusion
The Illusion of Objectivity
Bloomberg is not an activist rag like The Nation or a bomb-thrower like Rolling Stone. It doesn’t scream ideology—it murmurs it in measured tones, backed by graphs and spoken in boardrooms. But make no mistake: its influence is enormous, and its worldview is unmistakably progressive, technocratic, and globalist.
The most dangerous bias is not the kind that announces itself—but the kind that hides behind professionalism. That is Bloomberg News. Its tone of authority and data-rich presentation allows it to shape elite opinion and policy without ever appearing overtly partisan. But its core commitments are clear:
- Equity over merit
- DEI over liberty
- ESG over free markets
- Transgenderism over biology
- Globalism over national sovereignty
- Technocracy over constitutional government
It reinforces these values not through shrill editorializing, but through framing, language, omission, and tone. It tells its readers what to believe—not by argument, but by making opposing views invisible.
Bloomberg’s Role in the New Progressive Order
Michael Bloomberg’s media empire is an instrument of his vision: a world run by credentialed experts, managed through centralized data, and “nudged” into compliance with elite morality.
- It celebrates central banking but downplays fiscal sovereignty.
- It pushes ESG investing, while failing to disclose its financial interest.
- It supports censorship in the name of safety, while calling dissent “dangerous misinformation.”
- It embraces abortion and gender ideology, while scoffing at religious liberty as obstruction.
This is not journalism in the traditional sense—it is a PR arm of the ruling class, designed to normalize and promote progressive orthodoxy under the guise of financial reporting.
What It Means for the Reader
If you’re a concerned citizen who values faith, family, liberty, and national identity, do not be deceived by Bloomberg’s professionalism. Its tone may sound trustworthy, but its message is anything but neutral.
- It undermines the Second Amendment, while ignoring stories of lawful gun defense.
- It ridicules parental rights, while siding with activist teachers’ unions.
- It minimizes free speech concerns, while celebrating corporate alignment with DEI.
- It rejects biblical morality, while propping up radical gender theory and globalist mandates.
Bloomberg’s readership may be elite, but its ideas are morally bankrupt—devoid of transcendent values, hostile to tradition, and aligned with secular technocracy.
Final Verdict: Hall of Shame Worthy
Bloomberg News earns its place in the Hall of Shame because it:
- Uses financial journalism to promote progressive moral and political causes
- Prioritizes elite consensus over dissent, data over humanity, and ideology over truth
- Suppressed criticism of its founder while attacking his political enemies
- Promotes ESG despite profiting from it—without disclosure
- Amplifies government and corporate censorship of dissenting voices
- Enforces gender ideology, climate alarmism, and DEI without balance
It is the voice of the global managerial class—educated, secular, technocratic, and morally relativistic. It may not shout, but it speaks volumes.
Let the reader beware.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
MMXXV
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Realize that I sometimes use phrases like “trans man”, “trans woman”, “transgender” , “transition” or similar language for ease of communication. Obviously, as a conservative Christian, I don’t believe anyone has ever become the opposite sex. Unfortunately, we are forced to adopt the language of the left to discuss some topics without engaging in lengthy qualifying statements that make conversations awkward.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.