History of Iglesia Ni Cristo
Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC), or the “Church of Christ,” is a religious movement founded in the Philippines in 1914 by Felix Y. Manalo. Manalo, born into a Catholic family in 1886, explored several denominations—Methodist Episcopal, Presbyterian, and Seventh-day Adventist—before claiming a special calling as the last messenger of God in the last days. He officially registered INC with the Philippine government on July 27, 1914, coinciding with the outbreak of World War I—an event he interpreted as prophetically significant.
INC’s foundational text is the Bible, but it is interpreted exclusively through the teachings of Felix Manalo and later his son Eraño Manalo, and now his grandson Eduardo V. Manalo. They claim that the early church apostatized after the first century and that INC alone is the true restoration.
Over the 20th and 21st centuries, INC grew into a powerful religious organization with significant influence in Filipino politics and media. The group now claims around 3 million adherents globally, with major congregations in the Philippines, the U.S., Canada, and parts of the Middle East.
Controversies have plagued the organization. Most notable is the 2015 internal schism where whistleblowers from within the Manalo family alleged financial corruption and threats of violence against dissenters. Several ex-members have reported spiritual abuse, manipulation, and fear-based control.
Principles and Foundational Assumptions
INC Theology:
- God: God the Father alone is God. Jesus Christ is not divine; He is a created being and a servant.
- Christ: Jesus is the Son of God but not God Himself—He is subordinate and distinct.
- Holy Spirit: Not a Person but God’s active force.
- Salvation: Must be a registered member of the INC and subject to its leadership to be saved.
- Authority: Only INC interprets the Bible correctly. All other churches are apostate.
- Truth and Knowledge: Truth is determined by the interpretation given by church leaders; outside scholarship is rejected.
Biblical Christianity:
- God: One God in three Persons—Father, Son, Holy Spirit (Trinity).
- Christ: Fully God and fully man; eternal, uncreated, co-equal with the Father.
- Holy Spirit: Fully divine Person, not an impersonal force.
- Salvation: By grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8–9), not of works or church affiliation.
- Authority: Scripture alone (Sola Scriptura) is the final authority.
- Truth and Knowledge: God’s truth is objectively revealed in Scripture, accessible to all believers by the Holy Spirit.
INC’s teachings present a works-based, authoritarian system contrary to the gospel of grace and the priesthood of all believers.
Modern Influencers and Institutions
INC is currently led by Eduardo V. Manalo, the Executive Minister. The organization is structured hierarchically, with local ministers reporting to higher regional authorities. Media outlets such as INCTV and the publication Pasugo are used for propaganda, theological instruction, and community cohesion.
On social media, INC maintains an active presence through official YouTube channels and sites promoting “Bible Expositions” and live Q&A sessions where church ministers respond to questions—often ridiculing mainstream Christian doctrine in the process.
Notable online influencers include ministers like Michael Sandoval and Jeff Albea, who actively engage in debates with evangelicals and publish doctrinal lessons to reinforce INC exclusivism.
Psychological and Cultural Appeal
INC offers tight-knit community support, strict moral expectations, and clear boundaries of truth and authority. Family loyalty is deeply ingrained—entire households often join together, and dissent can result in shunning or familial breakdown.
Culturally, INC appeals to Filipino nationalism, teaching that the Philippines is a special nation in redemptive history. Their global expansion reinforces a sense of divine mission and pride among members.
In contrast, biblical Christianity offers security not in group affiliation, but in Christ alone. Grace—not performance—defines the believer’s identity, offering freedom and peace rather than fear and coercion.
Practical Outcomes and Cultural Fruits
On the surface, INC members may appear devout, morally upright, and community-oriented. Their churches are orderly, and their unity is impressive. However, the authoritarian nature of the movement has created deep psychological burdens for many.
Former members report guilt manipulation, suppression of independent thought, and emotional trauma. Allegations of familial separation, threats, and abuse have surfaced, especially when members question leadership or try to leave.
By contrast, biblical Christianity—while certainly not without flawed individuals—teaches liberty of conscience, encourages spiritual growth in community, and insists on personal relationship with Christ, not institutional loyalty, as the path to salvation.
Criticisms that Biblical Christianity Poses to Iglesia Ni Cristo
Biblical Christianity challenges INC in several areas:
- Christology: Denying the deity of Christ contradicts Scripture (John 1:1, Colossians 1:16–19).
- Salvation: Requiring church membership for salvation adds human merit to grace (Galatians 1:6–9).
- Authority: Restricting biblical interpretation to one church violates the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).
- Prophetic Claims: Felix Manalo as “last messenger” is unbiblical and unprovable.
- Spiritual Abuse: Practices of control, fear, and isolation run contrary to the Spirit of grace and truth.
Apologists like James White, Mike Winger, and former INC member Vincent Cornilla have published compelling refutations of INC doctrines.
Criticisms that Iglesia Ni Cristo Offers to Biblical Christianity
INC apologists accuse biblical Christianity of:
- Being apostate: They claim the true church disappeared and only reappeared through Felix Manalo.
- Promoting Trinitarian confusion: They argue the Trinity is illogical and polytheistic.
- Rejecting authority: They claim Protestants have too many denominations, proving disunity and error.
- Ignoring prophecy: They assert that biblical Christianity fails to recognize Felix Manalo’s role foretold in Revelation and Isaiah.
INC evangelists often mock traditional doctrine in debates, focusing more on perceived inconsistencies than biblical exegesis.
Christian Counter-Responses
- Church history refutes the claim of apostasy. Christ promised His church would never be overcome (Matthew 16:18). Historical continuity exists from the apostles to today’s faithful.
- The Trinity is not illogical but mysterious. Scripture clearly teaches one God in three Persons (Matthew 28:19, 2 Corinthians 13:14).
- Unity does not mean uniformity. The body of Christ includes diverse traditions united by faith in Christ and Scripture.
- Felix Manalo fails all tests of a prophet. His teachings contradict Scripture, his authority is self-appointed, and he lacks prophetic confirmation.
Ultimately, biblical Christianity proclaims salvation as a free gift of God—not a reward for membership or obedience to earthly leaders (Romans 3:24; Titus 3:5).
Chart of Fundamental Differences
| Doctrine | Iglesia Ni Cristo | Biblical Christianity |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of God | Unitarian – Father only is God | Trinitarian – Father, Son, Holy Spirit |
| View of Jesus | Created being, not divine | Eternal God, co-equal with the Father |
| Holy Spirit | Impersonal force | Divine Person |
| Salvation | By church membership and obedience | By grace through faith alone |
| Authority | INC leadership’s interpretation only | Scripture alone (Sola Scriptura) |
| View of other churches | All are false and apostate | Unity in diversity under Christ |
| Founding | 1914, Philippines | AD 33, Jerusalem |
Spiritual Nature of the Conflict
This is not merely a debate between institutions or doctrines. It is a spiritual battle (Ephesians 6:12). Deception cloaked in religious language is still deception. The enemy seeks to blind minds and enslave souls through half-truths and legalism.
Prayer is essential—not just for discernment, but for the release of those trapped in spiritual bondage. Christians must engage with compassion and courage, bearing the truth in love.
Why Contemporary Christians Must Be Equipped
The spread of Iglesia Ni Cristo into Western nations, especially among Filipino communities, makes it a growing apologetic challenge. Christians must understand the theological errors and learn how to respond wisely and graciously.
Knowing Scripture, reading trusted apologetic materials, and preparing for real conversations are critical. Encourage family members, neighbors, and coworkers with the gospel—not church rules, but the grace of Christ.
Recommended apologists include:
- James White – Alpha & Omega Ministries
- Mike Winger – BibleThinker YouTube Channel
- Vincent Cornilla – Former INC member now evangelical teacher
Robert Sparkman
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse and do not reflect my personal standards, particularly in regards to leftist protesters and rioters.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at [email protected] if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.