In the summer of 2020, America witnessed one of the most sustained and destructive periods of domestic unrest in modern history. Sparked by the tragic death of George Floyd, protests erupted across major cities—but many of these devolved into prolonged, coordinated, and ideologically driven riots. Portland endured over 100 consecutive nights of violence. Seattle saw the rise of anarchist “autonomous zones.” Businesses were looted and burned. Courthouses were attacked with firebombs and lasers. And yet, prominent media outlets, along with Democrat officials, described these events as “mostly peaceful protests.”
Rather than confront the violence with honesty and uphold law and order, corporate media and progressive politicians engaged in an Orwellian reframing of the chaos—shielding their ideological allies and vilifying federal officers and conservative leadership. This episode exposed not only deep media bias but the willingness of elite institutions to excuse lawlessness when it advances a Neo-Marxist agenda.
This blog post exposes how the 2020 riots were portrayed, protected, and politicized by the American Left.
Description of the Event
- Timeline: From May 2020 through late summer, major U.S. cities experienced sustained unrest. What began as protests over George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis quickly turned into rioting and looting in dozens of urban centers.
- Epicenters of chaos:
- Portland, OR: Over 100 nights of violence including arson, explosives, and sieges on the federal courthouse.
- Seattle, WA: Establishment of the CHAZ/CHOP zone—a police-free anarchist enclave.
- Chicago, NYC, Minneapolis, Atlanta, Kenosha: Mass looting, arson, police station attacks, and assaults on officers.
- Consequences:
- Over $2 billion in property damage (the most in U.S. insurance history for civil unrest).
- At least 30 deaths, including retired police officer David Dorn.
- Thousands of police injured; over 2,000 assaults on officers.
Political or Ideological Motive
The ideological drivers behind the riots included:
- Neo-Marxism and Critical Theory: Rioters and their organizers often invoked terms from critical race theory and Marxist rhetoric—calling for the end of capitalism, police, and “whiteness.”
- Antifa and BLM alignment: Both groups expressed revolutionary aims. BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors openly described herself as a “trained Marxist.”
- Progressive enablers: Left-leaning politicians and media personalities defended or minimized the violence to avoid alienating their activist base.
- Ideological institutions:
- Media: CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and The New York Times used carefully chosen language and visuals to protect the protestors’ narrative.
- Democrat city officials: Refused to prosecute rioters or allow federal agents to intervene.
Definitions of Related Terms and Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Mostly Peaceful Protests | Euphemistic phrase used by media to describe riots with significant violence, looting, or arson |
| CHAZ/CHOP | Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone / Occupied Protest: a 6-block area in Seattle where police were expelled and crime surged |
| Antifa | Militant far-left collective opposing capitalism and traditional institutions; known for violent tactics |
| Ideological Possession | A condition where institutions or individuals become dominated by dogmatic belief systems, leading to denial of facts |
Summary of Coverage by Conservative News Outlets
Conservative news outlets—Fox News, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, Breitbart, Newsmax, and others—provided detailed coverage of:
- The physical destruction in major cities
- Interviews with devastated small business owners
- Documented attacks on law enforcement
- Exposés on Democrat policies that protected rioters
- On-the-ground reporting from journalists like Andy Ngo, who captured raw footage of Antifa violence
They emphasized how the events were ideologically driven insurrections, not spontaneous outpourings of grief.
Summary of Coverage by Progressive (Woke) News Outlets
CNN, MSNBC, NPR, The New York Times, Vox, and The Washington Post largely reframed the riots as:
- Expressions of “racial justice”
- “Unrest” or “clashes” rather than “riots”
- “Over-policing” and “white supremacy” as root causes
- Federal officers as aggressors rather than defenders
One of the most infamous examples came from MSNBC’s Ali Velshi, who declared: “This is mostly a protest. It is not, generally speaking, unruly,” while standing in front of a burning building.
Analysis from the Conservative News Outlets Lens
- Law and Order: The first duty of government is to protect its citizens. Conservative outlets highlighted the abdication of this duty by Democrat leaders who sided with mobs.
- Selective outrage: The same media and politicians who excused months of left-wing violence would later describe January 6 as the worst day since 9/11.
- Hypocrisy: While Republican-led events were described as “superspreaders,” BLM protests were praised as vital civic participation—even during COVID lockdowns.
- Ideological bias: Corporate media became a de facto propaganda arm for leftist causes, distorting the narrative to protect favored groups and ideologies.
Analysis from the Progressive News Outlets Lens
- Moral framing: Riots were seen as the result of “systemic racism” and “oppression.”
- Federal intervention as fascism: DHS agents sent to protect Portland’s courthouse were called “secret police” and likened to Gestapo tactics.
- Property damage rationalized: Many commentators insisted that property damage was unimportant compared to the alleged centuries of racial injustice.
- Violence as voice: Commentators suggested looting and violence were the “language of the unheard,” borrowing lines from MLK while ignoring his actual calls for nonviolence.
Comparison of the Two Perspectives
| Category | Conservative View | Progressive View |
|---|---|---|
| Protesters | Criminal rioters | Civil rights activists |
| Federal Defense | Necessary protection of federal property | Authoritarian oppression |
| Media Coverage | Biased and manipulative | Advocating for justice |
| Rioter Motivation | Revolutionary, anti-American | Reaction to systemic injustice |
| Long-Term Impact | Erosion of law, trust, and economy | Awakening to racial reckoning |
Political or Ideological Implications
- Law enforcement demonized: Resulting in officer retirements, low morale, and surging crime.
- Rise of woke corporatism: Companies pledged billions to racial equity initiatives but remained silent about destroyed businesses.
- Media’s loss of credibility: Many Americans now see the press as an ideological actor rather than an objective watchdog.
- Legitimation of violence: Future radicals may feel emboldened, knowing that violence aligned with leftist causes will be excused or praised.
Public Reaction
- Split reactions:
- Democrats overwhelmingly approved of the protests (even after violence emerged).
- Republicans and independents were far more critical.
- Shifting allegiance: Trust in mainstream media plummeted, while interest in independent and conservative outlets soared.
- Polarization intensified: The riots became a dividing line in the culture war over truth, justice, and America’s future.
Key Figures Involved
Donald J. Trump
- 45th President (Republican)
- America First, law-and-order conservative
- Sent DHS agents to defend federal buildings; denounced rioters as “domestic terrorists”
- Quote: “LAW & ORDER!”
Ted Wheeler
- Mayor of Portland (Democrat)
- Progressive urban liberal
- Opposed federal intervention, even joined protesters
- Quote: “Thank you… for opposing the Trump administration’s occupation of our city.”
Kate Brown
- Governor of Oregon (Democrat)
- Far-left progressive
- Refused National Guard deployment, blamed Trump for violence
- Quote: Referred to federal agents as “Trump’s occupying force”
Jay Inslee
- Governor of Washington (Democrat)
- Progressive climate activist
- Claimed ignorance of CHAZ despite media coverage
- Quote: “That’s news to me.”
Jenny Durkan
- Mayor of Seattle (Democrat)
- Progressive, identity-politics advocate
- Allowed CHAZ zone, called it a “summer of love”
- Reversed after violence forced police return
- Quote: “We could have the summer of love.”
Andy Ngo
- Independent journalist (libertarian conservative)
- Documented Antifa violence; physically attacked multiple times
- Key figure in exposing media and government lies
Ali Velshi
- MSNBC correspondent (progressive)
- Downplayed riot while standing near burning building
- Quote: “It is not, generally speaking, unruly.”
Historical Context
The 2020 riots follow a pattern seen in:
- The French Revolution – Moral justification of mob violence
- Weimar Germany – Militant street activism as political theater
- 1960s radicalism – Now institutionalized and mainstream
This time, however, elite institutions enabled and excused the violence, rather than resisting it.
Potential Long-Term Effects
- Normalization of political violence
- Criminal justice system weaponized by ideology
- Rise in violent crime and police retreat
- Media trust collapse
- Growth of counter-media and cultural resistance
Conclusion
The 2020 riots revealed a terrifying truth: America’s legacy media, elite politicians, and cultural institutions are willing to tolerate and reframe violence if it serves progressive goals. “Mostly peaceful” became a meme not because of a typo, but because of a betrayal. A betrayal of truth, of public trust, and of the millions of Americans—especially working-class and minority business owners—who paid the price.
What we witnessed wasn’t a protest. It was a soft insurrection against the American order. And it was televised—through smoke and fire—with a smile.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
Some sources of information may reflect a libertarian and/or atheistic perspective. I may not agree with all of their opinions, but they offer some worthwhile comments on the topic under discussion.
Additionally, language used in the videos may be coarse. Coarse language does not reflect my personal standards.
Finally, those on the left often criticize my sources of information, which are primarily conservative and/or Christian. Truth is truth, regardless of how we feel about it. Leftists are largely led by their emotion rather than facts. It is no small wonder that they would criticize the sources that I provide. And, ultimately, my wordview is governed by Scripture. Many of my critics are not biblical Christians.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots. You can always send me an email at christiannewsjunkie@gmail.com if you want to comment on something, though.
I will continue to add items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.