For decades, conservative parents and legislators have sounded the alarm: America’s public school system is no longer a neutral arbiter of education but an ideological battlefield. State-sponsored school choice—whether through education savings accounts (ESAs), charter school access, or voucher programs—has emerged as a critical tool in restoring liberty, excellence, and integrity to the American education system. At its core, school choice is about empowering parents to make the best decisions for their children and removing the monopoly that government-run schools hold over educational funding. Conservatives believe the time has come for state legislatures to take the reins and codify meaningful, broad-based school choice laws that reflect the values and needs of their citizens.
Progressive Indoctrination in Public Schools
The urgency for school choice is magnified by the disturbing ideological shifts within public education. Under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” leftist ideologues have flooded classrooms with content rooted in critical theory and intersectionality—two radical academic movements that sort individuals into groups of “oppressors” and “victims” based on race, gender identity, and perceived power structures. These constructs breed resentment and division, instilling false guilt in some students and a sense of entitlement or victimhood in others.
Even worse, public schools increasingly promote unbiblical values, often bypassing parental consent. Activist teachers, administrators, and guidance counselors push transgender ideology, radical gender theory, and hypersexualized materials, sometimes even hiding students’ “gender transitions” from their parents. In some school districts, drag queen story hours, “gender unicorn” handouts, and sexually explicit literature are now standard fare. What was once a place for learning math, science, and history has turned into a social laboratory for leftist experimentation.
The COVID Crisis and Union Power Grabs
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed just how broken the public education system is—and how much power the teachers’ unions wield. As learning shifted online, the academic failures of the system were laid bare. Students in low-income areas were hit hardest by closed schools, while union leaders delayed reopening based on political calculations rather than science or concern for children. Meanwhile, unions made ideological demands—like defunding the police and implementing race-based curricula—before they would agree to return to work.
Test scores plummeted. According to the Nation’s Report Card, math and reading proficiency dropped to levels not seen in decades. And yet, union leaders remained obstinate, continuing to draw salaries while many students sat in front of screens or fell through the cracks altogether. These events helped fuel an exodus from public schools and reignited the call for school choice.
The False Arguments Against School Choice—and Conservative Counterpoints
Critics of school choice argue that it drains resources from public schools, increases segregation, and disproportionately benefits wealthier families. Let’s address these one by one:
- “It defunds public schools.”
This is a misleading claim. The money follows the student—not the system. When a family chooses a charter, private, or homeschool option, the state isn’t “defunding” the public school; it’s redirecting funds to the institution the family selects for their child. This encourages competition, innovation, and accountability—something public schools desperately need. - “It promotes segregation.”
On the contrary, many minority and low-income families benefit from school choice because they are trapped in failing schools in urban districts. School choice opens doors to better education and upward mobility. If anything, it’s the zip-code-based public school system that perpetuates economic and racial segregation. - “It’s discriminatory.”
This argument stems from the idea that private schools, particularly religious ones, may maintain standards regarding admissions or beliefs. But the real discrimination is forcing religious families to send their children to schools hostile to their worldview while paying taxes to support it. Far from being discriminatory, school choice fosters pluralism and respects conscience. - “Only the rich will benefit.”
Ironically, wealthy families already exercise school choice—they move to better districts or pay private school tuition. School choice levels the playing field by giving working-class and middle-class families similar opportunities without the heavy financial burden.
The Rising Cost and Decline of Public Education
Despite skyrocketing per-pupil spending—often exceeding $15,000 per year—public schools have consistently underperformed. Since the 1970s, inflation-adjusted education spending has tripled, yet test scores have flatlined or declined. Where is the money going? Much of it fuels a bloated bureaucracy of non-teaching administrators and consultants whose roles often focus more on enforcing ideology than enhancing learning. Students face larger class sizes, deteriorating facilities, and outdated materials—all while more taxpayer dollars are poured into “equity coordinators,” “diversity officers,” and DEI training seminars.
The Equity Trap: A Ceiling on Excellence
The left’s obsession with “equity” harms precisely those students who are academically motivated. Equity, in the progressive sense, doesn’t mean equal opportunity—it means equal outcomes, often achieved by dragging down high achievers rather than lifting up struggling students. Advanced programs are being eliminated, admissions to elite schools are being diluted, and grading standards are being relaxed to mask poor performance. The message? Excellence is unfair. Merit is oppressive. This ethos punishes gifted students and ultimately lowers the bar for all.
Is School Choice Discriminatory?
Some claim that school choice will marginalize vulnerable students or discriminate against LGBT students or others in “non-affirming” religious schools. But that argument flips liberty on its head. No family is forced to attend a religious school. The point of school choice is to decentralize education and return authority to parents. Religious schools exist because many families wish to educate their children in accordance with their faith. Denying them that right—or their tax dollars—is the real discrimination.
It’s also worth noting that many public school educators themselves choose not to send their children to the schools in which they work. A study by the Fordham Institute found that public school teachers are significantly more likely than the general public to send their children to private schools. That speaks volumes.
The Teacher Unions: Bastions of Leftism
Public school teachers’ unions, like the NEA and AFT, have increasingly become political arms of the Democratic Party. Their platforms openly endorse abortion, LGBTQ activism, “anti-racism” training, and radical gender ideology. They promote policies that undermine parental rights and sideline biblical morality. In their worldview, the state—not the parent—is the chief moral instructor of children. These organizations resist accountability, oppose parental transparency, and aggressively lobby against school choice, fearing that competition will expose their failures.
The Injustice of Forced Funding
Perhaps the most galling aspect of the current system is that Christian families are compelled to fund their own marginalization. Through property taxes, families pay into school systems that often attack their values, undermine their faith, and indoctrinate their children. In many cases, the curriculum and culture of these schools is openly anti-Christian. Is it fair to demand that a conservative, Bible-believing parent subsidize a system that actively seeks to dismantle the moral framework they instill at home?
Democrats and the Monopoly on Minds
Opposition to school choice comes almost exclusively from Democrats and their allies in the teachers’ unions. They argue for “public good” while maintaining a rigid monopoly on funding and access. In reality, what they seek is control—the ability to shape the next generation according to leftist priorities. By blocking school choice, they deny parents alternatives and force them to submit their children to state indoctrination.
The Moral Mandate for School Choice
At stake is nothing less than our children’s future and our nation’s moral foundation. Conservatives understand that education is not a neutral endeavor—it shapes beliefs, worldviews, and character. When the state seizes the role of educator without accountability or competition, liberty dies a little more each day.
School choice is not a silver bullet, but it is a vital step toward restoring integrity, excellence, and freedom in education. It affirms the God-given authority of parents, respects the diversity of convictions in a pluralistic society, and places education back where it belongs: in the hands of families, not bureaucrats.
S.D.G.,
Robert Sparkman
rob@christiannewsjunkie.com
RELATED CONTENT
Concerning the Related Content section, I encourage everyone to evaluate the content carefully.
If I have listed the content, I think it is worthwhile viewing to educate yourself on the topic, but it may contain coarse language or some opinions I don’t agree with.
Feel free to offer your comments below. Respectful comments without expletives and personal attacks will be posted and I will respond to them.
Comments are closed after sixty days due to spamming issues from internet bots.
You can always send me an email at rob@christiannewsjunkie.com if you want to comment on something afterwards, though.
If you have evidence that I am wrong about a material statement of fact, provide the evidence and I will gladly review it and make revisions if merited. Obviously, there are some assertions that are matters of opinion that I will not change, but I always strive to be truthful.
I will continue to add videos and other items to the Related Content section as opportunities present themselves.
I recommend these Youtube channels and commentators for good content on politics and news from a Christian and/or conservative worldview: Albert Mohler, Allie Beth Stuckey, Bill O’Reilly, CBN News, Hugh Hewitt, John Anderson Media (Australia), Nick Freitas, Ruthless Podcast (language warning), Scott Jennings, The Hot Zone with Chuck Holton, Vince Dao, and Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Albert Mohler’s channel on Youtube has a daily episode called The Briefing with Albert Mohler that I highly recommend. Allie Beth Stuckey’s channel is top-notch, too.
For livestreaming of political protests and riots by conservative commentators, check out Nate Friedman, Cam Higby, James Klug, and Nick Shirley. I don’t agree with the perspectives of all these commentators and the language of protesters is often obscene. Most news outlets will not cover these illegal assemblies, though, because it doesn’t promote their narrative.
Depictions of Jesus Christ are used in some illustrations. I realize that some including conservative Presbyterians consider this to be idolatry. I respectfully disagree with their position on this matter as the commandment forbids worshiping such depictions, and I do not worship these illustrations.